Population theories - Malthus and Boserup
Published on: Mar 4, 2016
Transcripts - Population theories - Malthus and Boserup
Malthus, Boserup and the Club of Rome
1766-1834. Born near Guildford!
Wrote ‘An essay in the First Principle of
population’ first published in 1798
Debatable whether the principles of
Malthus two hundred years ago (that were
very revolutionary and controversial) have
any relevance to the modern world.
The world population in 1798 was at nine
million people. We have now passed the
six billion mark.
¤ Food is necessary for human existence
¤ Human population tends to grow faster than the
power in the earth to produce subsistence
¤ The effects of these two unequal powers must
be kept equal
¤ Since humans tend not to limit their population
size voluntarily - “preventive checks” in Malthus’
The Core Principles of Malthus:
Malthus recognised that population if unchecked,
grows at a geometric rate:
1 2 4 8 16 32
However, food only increases at an arithmetic rate,
as land is finite.
1 2 3 4 5 6
and therefore he said….
Malthus suggested that once this ceiling
(catastrophe) had been reached, further growth
in population would be prevented by negative
and positive checks. He saw the checks as a
natural method of population control. They can
be split up into 3 groups….
Negative Checks were used to limit the population
growth. It included abstinence/ postponement of
marriage which lowered the fertility rate.
Malthus favoured moral restraint (including late
marriage and sexual abstinence) as a check on
population growth. However, it is worth noting
that Malthus proposed this only for the working
and poor classes!
Negative checks (decreased birth
Positive Checks were ways to reduce population
size by events such as famine, disease, war -
increasing the mortality rate and reducing life
Positive checks (increased death
'J' Curve - Population Crash Model
There has been a population explosion
Africa – repeated famines, wars, food crisis,
environmental degradation, soil erosion, crop
failure and disastrous floods – so was he right?
Was Malthus right?
Technological improvements which he could not
The increased amount of cropland due to irrigation
Reduced population growth as countries move
through the DTM
Group of industrialists, scientists, economists and
statesmen from 10 countries
Published ‘The Limits to Growth’ in 1972
The Club of Rome
If present growth trends in world population
continue and if associated industrialisation,
pollution, food production and resource
depletion continue unchanged, the limits to
growth on this planet will be reached sometime
in the next 100 years.
The most probably result will be sudden and
uncontrollable decline in both population and
The Club of Rome – basic
Don’t panic yet!
Doesn’t take human dimension sufficiently into
Human race is adaptable and innovative
Human responses have changed – e.g.
alternative sources of fuel (to replace fossil
fuels), HYVs seeds to prevent starvation in parts
Is the Club of Rome right?
Boserup believed tat people have the resources
of knowledge and technology to increase food
Opposite to Malthus – she suggested that
population growth has enabled agricultural
development to occur
Assumes people knew of the techniques
required by more intensive systems and used
them when the population grew.
Esther Boserup 1965
Demographic pressure (population density)
promotes innovation and higher productivity in use
of land (irrigation, weeding, crop intensification,
better seeds) and labour (tools, better techniques).
Boserup argued that the changes in technology
allow for improved crop strains and increased
Was she right?
Boserup admits overpopulation can lead to
unsuitable farming practices which may degrade
e.g. population pressure as one of the reasons
for desertification in the Sahal region (so fragile
environments at risk)
Boserup’s theory based on assumption of
‘closed’ society -not the case in reality