Published on: Mar 4, 2016
Transcripts - Poll Wa
KEY FINDINGS FROM A SURVEY OF VOTERS IN
WASHINGTON’S 8th CONGRESSIONAL
Project #: 09409
On behalf of the Pew Environment
Group (PEG) Public Opinion Strategies
conducted a survey of 400 registered
voters in Washington’s eighth
congressional district. The survey was
conducted September 15-17, 2009 and
has a margin of error of +4.9%.
A majority of voters say global warming a
Total Serious 61%
Total Not Serious 35%
Somewhat Serious 4%
31% Not Serious at All
Not too Serious
Generally speaking, how serious of a threat do you think global warming is today, very serious, somewhat serious, not too serious, or not
serious at all-or don't you have an opinion on this?
District voters believe dealing with global
warming will either have no effect on the number
of jobs available, or create new jobs.
Which comes closer to your point of view? Efforts to reduce global warming will cost American jobs; Efforts to reduce global warming
will not affect American jobs; or Efforts to reduce global warming will create new American jobs.
District voters were told about an energy
proposal and asked if they favor or oppose it.
Congress is considering an energy plan that has two
One part would require factories and power
companies to reduce their emissions of the carbon
pollution that causes global warming by 17% by the
year 2020 and by 80% by the year 2050.
The other part would require power companies to
generate 20% of their power from clean energy
sources like wind and solar by the year 2025.
The energy proposal enjoys broad support across
all key sub-groups.
Favor/Oppose Two-Part Sub-Groups %Favor %Oppose
Energy Plan Men 63% 34%
Women 74% 20%
Under 45 74% 22%
68% Over 45 65% 29%
Republicans 50% 47%
Independents 58% 32%
Democrats 91% 5%
Less Than College 68% 28%
26% College+ 69% 25%
Core/East King County 71% 23%
King County South
Total Favor Total Oppose
Pierce County 72% 26%
A majority of voters say they would be more likely to
vote for a candidate who supported the energy bill
being considered by Congress.
Candidate A supported the clean energy jobs and global warming
bill considered by Congress because moving the country to clean
energy will create good jobs here in the state of Washington. By
the year twenty-thirty it will reduce our dependence on foreign
oil by one-quarter of our nation's current consumption, saving
consumers more than one hundred and thirty-five billion dollars
in fuel costs. It will also decrease the carbon pollution that
causes global warming, and make polluters pay to give middle-
income Americans an energy tax credit.
Candidate B opposed the global warming bill considered by
Congress because it will create a new energy tax at the worst
possible time when families are struggling to survive the
recession. Americans will be forced to pay more every time they
drive, buy groceries, or flip on a light switch, up to as much as
three thousand dollars per year per family. This backdoor tax will
make our struggling economic situation worse, costing us
hundreds of thousands of jobs and pushing American companies
overseas where taxes and regulations are less burdensome.