Population dynamics in Kampong chicken and consequences for HPAI vaccination: results of a field trial in Java
Poster by F. Unger, W. Priyono, E. Siregar, M. Azhar, B. Bett, M. Mclaws, C. Jost and J.C. Mariner presented at the 13th conference of the International Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Maastricht, the Netherlands, 20-24 August 2012.
Published on: Mar 4, 2016
Transcripts - Population dynamics in Kampong chicken and consequences for HPAI vaccination: results of a field trial in Java
Population dynamics in Kampong chicken and consequences for HPAI vaccination: Results of a field trial in Java Unger, F1, Priyono, W3, Siregar, E2, Azhar, M4, Bett, B 1, Mclaws, M 1, Jost, C 1, Mariner, JC1 1) International Livestock Research Institute, Kenya, Nairobi 2) FAO; Campaign Management Unit, Ministry of Agriculture, Jakarta, Indonesia 3) Disease Investigation Centre, Wates, Indonesia 4) Campaign Management Unit, Ministry of Agriculture, Jakarta, IndonesiaPhoto: Unger, Yogyakarta Province, Java, 2009 Figure 1: All chicken were leg or wing banded INTRODUCTION Until today highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) of the subtype H5N1 in poultry is considered to be endemic in most of the Indonesian provinces since it was officially declared in 2004. Vaccination is used as one of the control strategies targeting layer and breeder farms but also Kampong (village) chicken. Limited information is available on the scope of off‐take and replacement occurring in Kampong chicken populations under field condition and their effects on HPAI vaccination. Therefore the presented field (community) vaccination trial was designed. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of a continuous off‐take and replacement – naturally occurring in Kampong chicken populations – on antibody profiles under filed conditions. Photo: Unger, Yogyakarta Province, Java, 2008 MATERIALS AND METHODS Figure 2: Average proportion of the total chicken population by age class in enrolled communities over time, Yogyakarta, Java The purpose of these trials was to compare flock antibody profiles resulting from quarterly vaccination programs that employed either a single dose regimen or a primary vaccination followed in 21 days by a booster shot in naturally occurring Kampong chicken populations with typical age profiles and exit/entries. Twelve communities with estimated chicken populations of 300-500 each were enrolled in the study: six in Sleman District and six in Kulon Progo District, Yogyakarta, Java. The trial was carried out between July 2008 and August 2009. Four communities were assigned to a booster vaccination regime, four to a single vaccination regime, and four remained as un-vaccinated control communities. Chicken numbers were monitored collected in weekly intervals. Serological samples were collected in six-week intervals, 60 per community and up to five per selected household from Left: A dairy farmer supplying milk to the collector and waiting for quality test (alcohol test and lactometer reading). Middle: Milk collector checking freshness of milk with alcohol test and adultration (water) with lactometer reading. Right: milk collection center where raw milk randomly selected chickens, and subjected to HI (H5) testing. is collected from dairy farmers and raw milk, cheese and pasteurized milk is sold to consumers. RESULTS Results of HPAI serology – Booster vaccinations resulted in significantly higher overall individual HI (H5) titres over the field trials at all sampling Table 1: Change of population over time for Sindutan A and dates. Kalimanjung community over time, Yogyakarta, Java Jul - Oct Oct 2008 – Jan – Apr Poultry population results - indicate that 39-44% of chickens were younger 2008 Jan 2009 2009 than two months of age over time and more than two-thirds of chickens were younger than four months, respectively. Adult chickens represented only Kalimanjung 10% ( male) and 20% (female) of the total population (Figure 2). Though Total entries 72% 58% 49% overall population size within the selected communities was relatively stable, the number of chickens changed widely within age classes. In each Total Exits 69% 56% 51% observed quarter, there was a 43% or higher turnover of the population Sindutan A (Table 1). Observed changes were related to socio-cultural events such as holidays or begin of school. Total entries 56% 43% 49% Total Exits 19% 44% 68% CONCLUSIONS From our results we can conclude that approximately 40% of a natural backyard population will be un-vaccinated by 60 days after the onset of a vaccination campaign. Considering this high population turnover rate, even a quarterly vaccination regime including a booster round is required will have difficulty achieving effective flock immunity levels. This results in high costs, poses a significant logistical challenge and suggests mass vaccination is not a practical approach to sustained control of HPAI in Kampong (village) chicken populations.