Published on: Mar 4, 2016
Transcripts - Polybius intro
Introduction toPolybiusD Posker-HillHistory Extension
Who was Polybius?Πολύβιος200–118 BCGreek - ArcadiaHis books are like the sun in the field of Romanhistory; where they begin, the misty veils whichstill cloak the Samnite and Pyrrhic wars are lifted,where they finish, a new and if possible still morevexatious twilight begins." Mommsen, RomischeGeschichte (gth ed, 1903).
Features of his Work„causation‟: 3 tieredthe reasons systemwhyEye-Witness Written Sources Military-Political Focus
ThematicFocus?• Rome‟s rise to power • Only took “53 years”• Military and Political Systems • Judgements are made throughout • Lost text “Tactics”• Theory of „regular cycle[s] of constitutional revolutions‟ • kingship, aristocracy and democracy
Use of EvidencePolybius used both written historicalrecords, personal experience and eye witnessesto compile evidence for use in his histories. 8 In the course of this work it will become more clearly intelligible by what steps this power was acquired, and it will also be seen how many and how great advantages accrue to the student from the systematic treatment of history. Polybius
Longue Duree?Polybius extols a „general history‟ 3 As it is, I observe that while several modern writers deal with particular wars and certain matters connected with them, no one, as far as I am aware, has even attempted to inquire critically when and whence the general and comprehensive scheme of events originated and how it led up to the end. 4 I therefore thought it quite necessary not to leave unnoticed or allow to pass into oblivion this the finest and most beneficent of the performances of Fortune. 5 For though she is ever producing something new and ever playing a part in the lives of men, she has not in a single instance ever accomplished such a work, ever achieved such a triumph, as in our own times. 6 We can no more hope to perceive this from histories dealing with particular events than to get at once a notion of the form of the whole world, its disposition and order, by visiting, each in turn, the most famous cities, or indeed by looking at separate plans of each: a result by no means likely. 7 He indeed who believes p13that by studying isolated histories he can acquire a fairly just view of history as a whole, is, as it seems to me, much in the case of one, who, after having looked at the dissevered limbs of an animal once alive and beautiful, fancies he has been as good as an eyewitness of the creature itself in all its action and grace. 8 For could anyone put the creature together on the spot, restoring its form and the comeliness of life, and then show it to the same man, I think he would quickly avow that he was formerly very far away from the truth and more like one in a dream. 9 For we can get some idea of a whole from a part, but never knowledge or exact opinion. 10 Special histories therefore contribute very little to the knowledge of the whole and conviction of its truth. 11 It is only indeed by study of the interconnection of all the particulars, their resemblances and differences, that we are enabled at least to make a general survey, and thus derive both benefit and pleasure from history.
Aim and PurposeThe aim and purpose A historian shouldfor Polybius for history not willingly dropwas to make history all pretence as topractical so that it could giving the „realbe utilized in military words‟ and attemptand political affairs as best they can toWorks of the historian give a verbatimshould not be like account, but ratherthose of a „poet‟ in attempt to provideexaggeration but as accurate arather rooted in recount asunbridled truth. possible.
What are the purposes of Polybius’ history? Changing aims and purposes Aims and Changingpurposes of role of history Polybius Purposes of history over time
How has history beenconstructed and recorded over time? Via Polybius Forms of historical Types of history in communication Polybius Written Political Use of sources Economic Lost works Military
How to study Polybius… Context Aims/purposesType of Methodology/ieshistory/researchfocus How their work has changed from previous/later work incl. critics