NANC Training Binder â€" September 9, 2006
Published on: Mar 3, 2016
Transcripts - NANC Training Binder â€" September 9, 2006
Modified September 9, 2006
September 9, 2006 1
NANC Training Mission:
The mission of the NANC Training (NT) ad hoc committee was to
work collectively with the NANC members to develop a brief yet
cohesive NANC Operating Manual. This manual was delivered in
the form of training via chapter, to the NANC members in both
the September and November 2005 NANC meetings. The end
goal was to provide an informational tool for new NANC
participants who should have a better understanding of the NANC
protocol after reviewing this manual. This project was short-term,
and updates to the manual may be made through the NANC
September 9, 2006 2
Chapter Title Contributor
Introduction 1 FCC Creation of the NANC Beth O’Donnell
Reference 1 Guidelines for Working Groups Beth O’Donnell
Reference 2 Listing of Resources John Manning
Introduction 3 Relationship Karen Mulberry
Introduction 2 Consensus Chairman Bob Atkinson
Introduction 4 Numbering and Public Policy Mark Lancaster
Groups 0 Working Groups vs. Issue Management Groups John Manning
Introduction 5 Members as Representatives Mark Lancaster, Don Gray
Groups 1 Future of Numbering (FoN) Karen Mulberry, Hoke Knox
Groups 2 Local Number Portability Administration Paula Jordan, Gary Sacra
Working Group (LNPA WG)
Groups 3 Billing and Collection Working Group (B&C WG) Jim Castagna, Rosemary Emmer
Groups 4 Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) Karen Riepenkroger, Rosemary Emmer
Affiliates 1 Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Ken Havens, Adam Newman
Groups 5 Issue Management Group (IMG) John Jefferson, George Guerra
Vendors 1 North American Numbering Plan Administrator John Manning
Vendors 2 Pooling Administrator (PA) Amy Putnam/Linda Hymans
Vendors 3 Welch & Co. Faith Marcotte
Acronym List Acronym List Don Gray
Version Version Tracking Matrix Rosemary Emmer
September 9, 2006 3
FCC Creation of the NANC
The North American Numbering Council (NANC) is a Federal Advisory Committee. The
NANC advises the Commission and makes recommendations, reached through
consensus, that foster efficient and impartial number administration. The NANC is
composed of representatives of telecommunications carriers, regulators, cable
providers, VoIP providers, industry associations, vendors and consumer advocates.
Working groups and task forces made up of industry experts have been established by
the NANC to assist it in its efforts. The initial NANC charter was filed with Congress on
October 5, 1995, and the NANC held its first meeting on October 1, 1996. The current
charter expires October 4, 2005.
The Commission's procurement of entities to serve as the North American
Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), and Pooling Administrator (PA) were
based on the NANC's recommended technical requirements. The NANC also
developed and recommended the database architecture and administrative plan
for the Number Portability Administration Center (NPAC) as captured in the
Commissions First Report and Order on Telephone Number Portability FCC
96-286, CC Docket No. 95-116. Since its inception, the NANC has provided
recommendations to the Commission which have addressed a myriad of issues,
including wireline/wireless integration for local number portability, abbreviated
dialing arrangements, the neutrality of toll free database administration, and the
feasibility of local number portability for 500/900 numbers. The NANC is currently
working on issues such as monitoring wireless and intermodal LNP
implementation, and the impact of VoIP and Electronic Numbering (ENUM) on
the North American Numbering Plan (NANP).
September 9, 2006 4
In the Matter of Administration of the North American Numbering Plan CC
Docket No. 92-237 REPORT AND ORDER
Adopted: July 13, 1995; Released: July 13, 1995
Par. 1: We adopt a model for administration of numbering in which the North American
Numbering Council will make recommendations to the Commission, develop policy, initially
resolve disputes and guide the North American Numbering Plan Administrator.
Par. 2: (w)e intend to seek advice from the North American Numbering Council on such issues
including, but not limited to, a plan to transfer responsibility for administering central office
codes to the North American Numbering Plan Administrator; conservation of numbering
resources, including examination of ways to ensure efficient use of number resources; and
whether the NANC, after two years, should continue as a federal advisory committee.
Additionally, we intend to seek on a continuing basis advice from the North American
Numbering Council on steps the Commission can take to foster efficient and impartial number
Par. 42: We intend to undertake the procedural steps set forth in FACA to create the "North
American Numbering Council" (NANC) as a Federal Advisory Committee for the purpose of
addressing and advising the Commission on policy matters relating to administration of the
NANP, some of which are discussed below and others of which may arise in the future.
Par 46: The purpose of the NANC will be to provide to the Commission advice and
recommendations reached through consensus to foster efficient and impartial number
administration as telecommunications competition emerges. Additionally, we direct the NANC to
select as NANP Administrator an independent, non-government entity that is not closely
associated with any particular industry segment. Initially, we seek from the NANC
recommendations on: (1) What the transition plan should be for transferring CO code
administration responsibilities from LECs to the new NANP Administrator? (2) What measures
should be taken to conserve numbering resources? (3) What number resources, beyond those
currently administered by the NANP Administrator should the NANP Administrator administer?
and (4) Whether the NANC, after two years, should continue as a federal advisory committee.
Par. 47: An advisory committee created under FACA must have a membership fairly balanced in
terms of the points of view represented. In meeting this requirement we anticipate council
membership would be drawn from all segments of the industry including LECs, Interexchange
Carriers (IXCs), Wireless Service Providers, Competitive Access Providers and other interested
parties both within the United States and from other NANP member countries. We further
anticipate council membership will include members representing state interests such as
NARUC, state public utility commissions, telecommunications users and other consumers
groups. The specific membership will be determined when the NANC charter is established.
Additionally, meetings must be open to the public, detailed meeting minutes prepared and a
designated federal official present at all meetings.
September 9, 2006 5
In the Matter of Telephone Number Portability CC Docket No. 95-116
First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Adopted: June 27, 1996; Released: July 2, 1996
Par 5: We conclude that a system of regional databases that are managed by an
independent administrator will serve the public interest. We direct the North American
Numbering Council (NANC) to provide initial oversight of this regional database system.
We direct the NANC to determine the number and location of the regional databases
and to select one or more administrators responsible for deploying the database
Par 9: We hereby direct the NANC to select as a local number portability
administrator(s) (LNPA(s)) one or more independent, non-governmental entities that
are not aligned with any particular telecommunications industry segment within seven
months of the initial meeting of the NANC…… The fundamental purpose of the NANC is
to act as an oversight committee with the technical and operational expertise to advise
the Commission on numbering issues. The Commission has already directed the NANC
to select a NANPA.
Par 95: We believe that the NANC should determine, in the first instance, whether one
or multiple administrators should be selected, whether LNPA(s) can be the same entity
selected to be the NANPA, how the LNPA(s) should be selected, the specific duties of
the LNPA(s), and the geographic coverage of the regional databases. Once the NANC
has selected the LNPA(s) and determined the locations of the regional databases, it
must report its decisions to the Commission. The NANC should also determine the
technical interoperability and operational standards, the user interface between
telecommunications carriers and the LNPA(s), and the network interface between the
SMS and the downstream databases. Finally, the NANC should develop the technical
specifications for the regional databases, e.g., whether a regional database should
consist of a service management system (SMS) or an SMS/SCP pair. In reaching its
decisions, the NANC should consider the most cost- effective way of accomplishing
number portability. We note that it will be essential for the NANPA to keep track of
information regarding the porting of numbers between and among carriers. We thus
believe it necessary for the NANC to set guidelines and standards by which the NANPA
and LNPA(s) share numbering information so that both entities can efficiently and
effectively administer the assignment of the numbering resource.
Par. 99: We believe that, at this time, the information contained in the number
portability regional databases should be limited to the information necessary to route
telephone calls to the appropriate service providers. The NANC should determine the
specific information necessary to provide number portability. To include, for example,
the information necessary to provide E911 services or proprietary customer-specific
information would complicate the functions of the number portability databases and
impose requirements that may have varied impacts on different localities.
September 9, 2006 6
Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98,
Second Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order
52.11 North American Numbering Council.
The duties of the North American Numbering Council (NANC), may include, but are not
(a) advising the Commission on policy matters relating to the administration of the
NANP in the United States;
(b) making recommendations, reached through consensus, that foster efficient and
impartial number administration;
(c) initially resolving disputes, through consensus, pertaining to number
in the United States;
(d) recommending to the Commission an appropriate entity to serve as the NANPA;
(e) recommending to the Commission an appropriate mechanism for recovering the
costs of NANP administration in the United States, consistent with § 52.17;
(f) carrying out the duties described in § 52.25; and
(g) carrying out this part as directed by the Commission.
September 9, 2006 7
Ideally, every decision taken by NANC and its subsidiary groups will be made by
unanimous consent. The Chair and Members should make reasonable attempts to
achieve unanimity. However, a requirement of unanimity would make it impossible for
NANC to make any controversial decisions since each Member would hold veto power.
When a decision must be made and unanimity is not possible, NANC decisions will be
made by consensus. (This means that decisions are not made by simple majority
But, what is “consensus” and how is it determined?
Fundamentally, determining when consensus is reached is a judgment call to be made
by the Chair. Included in the Chair’s judgment are not just the numbers of Members
"for" or "against" but, more importantly, the “weight” (i.e., the experience, reputation
and knowledge) of each Member who is “for” or “against.” Another judgment factor to
be considered by the Chair is the intensity with which each Member’s views are held.
The Chair cannot and should not attempt to determine when consensus is achieved by
some sort of mechanical “objective” process. However, the following examples
illustrate how the subjective decision might be made.
Each NANC Member earns his or her consensus “weight” through regular participation,
expertise, collegiality and other factors valued by the Chair. Thus, if only one
“heavyweight” – a very experienced, knowledgeable and fair person – was strongly
against a decision, that might be enough to defeat consensus. Similarly, if a large
number of "lightweights" (i.e., those who have earned little respect, rarely attend
meetings or participate in them) attend a meeting and take one side of an issue and a
similar number of "heavyweights" are on the other side, it would be reasonable for the
Chair to find that the heavyweights’ view constitute the consensus. Similarly, a smaller
number of heavyweight Members with intensely held views could constitute the
consensus against weakly held views of lighter weight Members.
Because determining consensus is inherently a subjective judgment by the Chair, due
process requires a Members who are disappointed by the Chair’s decision have an
appeal. In NANC, any Member who disputes the finding of a "consensus" may bring
their point of view to the next higher authority as a minority opinion. (The higher
authority is the full NANC in the case of subsidiary groups’ decisions and the FCC in the
case of the full NANC’s decisions). It is better for the higher authority to receive a
“consensus” decision and one or more “minority” opinions than to have no
September 9, 2006 8
recommendations at all. Indeed, having both “consensus” and “minority” views can be
very valuable to the higher authority.
In summary, unanimity is ideal. When unanimity is impossible, anything other than the
admittedly subjective consensus process runs the risk of gridlock. It is much better to
present a disputed consensus opinion than no advice at all. Consensus keeps things
moving and the "appeal" process ensures fairness.
September 9, 2006 9
NANC maintains both a formal and informal relationship with various industry
groups. These relationships are either defined by FCC Order, identified in the
NANC Charter or are conducted under an informal exchange of information with
other identified subject matter expert organizations.
- Formal relationships defined by FCC Order - NANPA, PA, B&C Agent, NAPM
LLC, and the FCC
- Formal relationships defined by the NANC Charter – ATIS Industry Numbering
- Formal relationship defined by the NANC – Working Groups, Issue Management Groups
(IMG) that NANC may create to investigate, study and prepare draft recommendations for
- Informal relationships defined by either the NANC or other parties that need
to exchange information with the NANC include various industry standards
and technology related groups – e.g. ATIS Committees - NIIF, ESIF
September 9, 2006 10
Numbering and Public Policy
What is the North American Numbering Council (NANC)?
On October 5, 1995, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) established the
North American Council (NANC), by filing its charter with Congress, to provide advice
and recommendations the FCC and other governments (including Canada and
Caribbean countries) on numbering issues. As a Federal Advisory Committee to the
Commission (under Title 5, U.S.C.), one of the NANC's first assignments was to select
neutral administrators for the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) and local number
portability (LNP). Following a competitive bidding process, the NANC selected Lockheed
Martin's Communications Industry Services (now NeuStar, Inc.) to be the North
American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA) and as the Local Number Portability
Since its inception, the Council has provided the Commission with critically important
recommendations regarding numbering issues. These recommendations have
addressed a myriad of issues, including wireline/wireless integration for local number
portability, abbreviated dialing arrangements, the neutrality of toll free database
administration and the feasibility of local number portability for 500/900 numbers. In
addition, the NANC has recently made recommendations concerning methods for
optimizing the use of numbering resources, the assignment of Feature Group D Carrier
Identification Codes to switchless resellers, and technical specifications for a National
Pooling Administrator and the North American Numbering Plan Administrator.
The value of this federal advisory committee to the telecommunications industry and to
the American public cannot be overstated. Numbers are the means by which businesses
and consumers gain access to, and reap the benefits of, the public switched network.
The Council's recommendations to the Commission facilitate fair and efficient
numbering administration in North America and help ensure that numbering resources
are available to all telecommunications service providers, consistent with the
requirements of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. www.nanc-chair.org/docs/nanc-
How do you become a member of the NANC?
NANC members include representatives from local exchange carriers (LECs),
interexchange carriers, wireless providers, manufacturers, state regulators, consumer
groups and telecommunications associations. www.nanc-chair.org/docs/nanc-
NANC members are approved by the FCC Wireline Competition Bureau as primary and
alternate representatives of their firm or organization. The membership has evolved
through consolidations, new entrants to the market and shifts in technology. The FCC
September 9, 2006 11
actively monitors the membership mix to assure a fair representation of interests in this
September 9, 2006 12
Members as Representatives
What is the role of a NANC Member?
In carrying out its responsibilities, the Council will assure that NANP and LNP
administration supports the following policy objectives: (1) that NANP and LNP
administration facilitates entry into the communications marketplace by making
numbering resources available on an efficient, timely basis to communications service
providers; (2) that NANP and LNP administration does not unduly favor or disfavor any
particular industry segment or group of consumers; (3) that NANP and LNP
administration does not unduly favor one technology over another; (4) that NANP and
LNP administration gives consumers easy access to the public switched telephone
network; and (5) that NANP and LNP administration ensures that the interests of all
NANP member countries are addressed fairly and efficiently, fostering continued
integration of the NANP across NANP member countries. www.nanc-
Membership in the NANC is designed to provide the FCC with a broad perspective on
1. Members should be present, on time, and prepared to stay until the end of the
2. Members should review all relevant documents prior to meetings and be prepared to
discuss all agenda items.
3. Members should refrain from repeating comments already made to ensure that all
participants have an opportunity to have comments fairly and completely presented.
4. Members comments should be relevant and to the point.
5. Members should strive to find grounds on which to reach consensus.
6. Members should always be civil and courteous and respect the dignity of NANC
members and others.
7. Members with positions on agenda items, who want those positions understood and
considered, are encouraged to provide contributions outlining their positions in
advance of meetings.
8. Members should notify the DFO, ADFO, and NANC Chair in advance of a meeting if
either the member or alternate is unable to attend. Any modifications to NANC
representation (i.e., changes to designated member or alternate) must be approved
by the FCC.
9. Members will review and agree upon final documents and or letters prior to official
10.Members have an obligation to reflect the public interest considerations when
representing their interest group.
September 9, 2006 13
11. Members are expected to share NANC developments with the entities that they
represent. (NANC Guidelines and Operating Principles April 17, 2001, www.nanc-
The NARUC Representatives
The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (The NARUC) is a non-
profit organization founded in 1889. Its members include the governmental agencies
that are engaged in the regulation of utilities and carriers in the fifty States, the District
of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. The NARUC's member agencies
regulate the activities of telecommunications, energy, and water utilities.
The NARUC's mission is to serve the public interest by improving the quality and
effectiveness of public utility regulation. The NARUC's members work to ensure the
establishment and maintenance of utility services as may be required by the public
convenience and necessity, and to ensure that such services are provided at rates and
conditions that are just, reasonable and nondiscriminatory for all consumers.
The NARUC provides six (6) representatives, each with a designated alternate, to the
North American Numbering Council (NANC). The NARUC representatives are typically
members of the NARUC Telecommunications Committee. The mission of The NARUC
Telecommunications Committee is to assist member Commissions and Commissioners
of The NARUC in carrying out their obligation to serve the public interest in the area of
telecommunications. Specifically, the Committee shall accomplish its mission by:
• Providing a regular and effective forum for the exchange of ideas and information
concerning regulatory issues in telecommunications.
• Providing and coordinating the resources needed to develop in-depth analyses of
telecommunications issues, particularly of the implications of various policy
choices on the development of a modern, high quality and ubiquitous
telecommunications infrastructure serving the needs of all customers; and
provides the support, guidance, and resources needed to participate effectively in
legislative and regulatory initiatives of common interest to the Commissioners
• Providing The Telecommunications Committee works closely with the Federal
Communications Commission, the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration, the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade
Commission, the Office of the United States Trade Representative, and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation.
The NASUCA Representatives
NASUCA is the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates. Its web site is
www.nasuca.org. NASUCA is NASUCA is an association of 44 consumer advocates in 42
states and the District of Columbia. NASUCA's members are designated by the laws of
September 9, 2006 14
their respective jurisdictions to represent the interests of utility consumers before state
and federal regulators and in the courts. NASUCA has two members on NANC.
NASUCA does not represent the interest of any commercial entities, but rather the
interest of consumers that purchase telecommunications services and are the end users
of numbering resources. NASUCA serves as an advocate for consumer interests.
NASUCA also has experience in state regulatory proceedings and brings that perspective
to the NANC.
What is the role of the role of the Designated Federal Officer (DFO)?
Generally, the role is to be the primary liaison between the NANC and the FCC. Note
that the DFO and the Assistant to the DFO share responsibilities. Additionally, from the
Federal Advisory Committee Act,, the following responsibilities are described:
FACA – DFO Responsibilities (from GSA FACA Training Manual):
1) Orienting new committee members
2) Approving or calling the meetings
3) Approving the agendas
4) Ensuring public participation in open advisory committee meetings
5) Attending the meetings
6) Adjourning the meeting when such an adjournment is in the public interest
7) Chairing the meeting when so directed by the agency head
8) Maintaining the records, reports, transcripts, minutes, appendices, working
papers, drafts, studies, agendas, or other documents which are made
available for public inspection and copying at a single location in the agency
until the advisory committee ceases to exist
9) Maintaining detailed minutes
10) Maintaining records of costs
11) Filing reports with the Library of Congress
12) Tracking committee recommendations and obtaining agency responses
September 9, 2006 15
Working Groups vs. Issue Management Groups
NANC Working Groups and their subcommittees are standing groups of the NANC that
are assigned specific tasks, have ongoing responsibility for a subject matter, and make
recommendations to NANC.
Working Group and subcommittee membership is open to any interested party.
NANC/WG Relationship - NANC establishes the clear direction for Working
Groups, makes assignments, as necessary, and sets due dates for the
delivery of reports to NANC.
Working Groups develop draft recommendations for NANC consideration, which NANC
can accept, reject, change, or remand back to the Working Group with additional
Issue Management Groups (IMGs)
IMGs are ad hoc groups formed to focus on specific issues that may not be appropriate
or practical to assign to an existing Working Group, and to make recommendations to
the NANC. IMGs are often used to define a new issue or work time-sensitive projects
with an expiration date. Once an IMG completes its work assignment, it is typically
IMG membership is open to interested parties, but the size of a given IMG may be
restricted for efficiency reasons.
NANC/IMG Relationship - NANC establishes the clear direction for IMGs, makes
assignments, as necessary, and sets due dates for the delivery of reports to NANC.
IMGs develop draft recommendations for NANC consideration, which NANC can accept,
reject, change, or remand back to the IMG with additional direction.
September 9, 2006 16
To explore changes to the environment, including new and future technologies,
the impact of market place and/or regulatory changes and innovations on
The Working Group will investigate new telephone numbering assignment
approaches and future telephone number assignment requirements. The
Working Group will identify common criteria and gather data to identify trends
and their impact upon numbering resources. The Working Group, if necessary,
will analyze opportunities to determine the feasibility and benefit of each and
report its findings to the NANC. The Working Group will also analyze various
topics that may be given to it from time to time by the NANC and/or FCC.
The NANC and the FCC are the target audience.
The Future of Numbering Working Group (FoN WG) is a standing Working Group
of the NANC that is assigned specific tasks, have ongoing responsibility for a
subject matter, and make recommendations to NANC. The FoN WG and any
subcommittee membership is open to any interested party.
The NANC establishes clear direction for the FoN WG, makes assignments, as
necessary, and sets due dates for the delivery of reports to NANC. The FoN WG
develops a draft recommendation for NANC consideration, which NANC can
accept, reject, change, or remand back to the FoN WG with additional direction.
For example, the NANC assigned the review of the LNPA WG’s Change Orders
(CO’s) 399 & 400 for VoIP Requirements to the FoN WG at its March 2005
meeting. The FoN WG had a joint meeting with the LNPA WG with presentations
and discussions on this issue to gain a better understanding of the task The
FoN evaluated CO’s 399 and 400, developed a report structure based on the
groups input. The FoN reached consensus on CO 399 but not on CO 400. The
FoN presented its findings in a report to the NANC on June 7th and asked NANC
to consider the report’s recommendations.
The FoN WG tracks its projects using a matrix; an example of this project matrix
is as follows:
September 9, 2006 17
Draft Project Tracking Report
Status as of June 7, 2005
Project Description Assignment Due Status
# Date Date
NANC Report on the Work on NANC report postponed
1 Future of Numbering September --- due to other urgent work items.
Work Suspended February 2005; Awaiting
2 Navy NPA Request November Suspended Action by the Navy.
Original: Work delayed due to other more
3 VoIP Number Assignment January May 2005 urgent item, namely Project #6;
Criteria 2005 Current: Anticipate report and NANC
July 2005 discussion during the July NANC
meeting instead of May.
Reviewing current applications in
4 Telematics March 2005 -- anticipation of analyzing future
Original: COMPLETED: FoN Change order
5 FoN response to LNPA March 2005 April 8, report. LNPA WG agrees the FoN
WG Letter 2005 WG’s response to the NANC
Current: regarding Project #6 will satisfy this
May 13, request. A copy of the FoN WG
2005 Report to be sent to LNPA-WG.
Joint meeting, presentations and
6 Review LNPA WG March 2005 Original discussions on this issue completed;
Change Orders 399 & 400 Date May Final report under development by
for VoIP Requirements 2005 co-chairs for use and discussion at
Revised the May NANC meeting. NANC
Date requested that Report be open for
June 10, further input on Change Order 400
2005 until June 7th, NANC to consider
recommendations on June 28th
September 9, 2006 18
Local Number Portability Administration WG
The Local Number Portability Administration Working Group (LNPA WG) is the
body that makes the decisions and recommendations that form the basis of the
regulatory orders issued by the FCC pertaining to LNP. The LNPA WG is also
responsible for the business functionality of the national LNP system and how
Service Providers inter-operate with it. Therefore, the activity of the LNPA WG
has a direct bearing on the processes and systems that each Service Provider
uses to participate in LNP.
The LNPA WG was given the charter by the North American Number Council
(NANC) for implementing Local Number Portability (LNP) on a national level. The
LNPA WG is responsible for developing and maintaining the process that is
followed by all Service Providers who participate in LNP. A complete description
of the operation flows is contained in Inter-Service Provider LNP Operations
Flows located on this Web site. These flows have been revised to include
wireless carrier operations. The updated flows will be included in the second
NANC report on Wireless Wireline Integration due out in the second quarter of
The LNPA WG is also responsible for defining the requirements for the national
Number Portability Administration Center (NPAC) Service Management System
(SMS) and how it interfaces to each Service Provider's local LNP system to
enable LNP. The NPAC SMS is operated by NeuStar, which serves as the central
mediation system and source database for all number portability data. The
requirements are contained in the "NPAC SMS Functional Requirements
Specification (FRS)" and the interface standards are contained in the "NPAC SMS
Interoperable Interface Specification (IIS)". Both documents are available on the
NPAC web page at www.npac.com under documents. The NPAC web site also
has documentation about pending change orders that will change the
functionality of both the NPAC SMS and the interface to it.
Telecommunications Carriers (Wireline, Wireless, VoIP, etc.)
What is the process to submit an issue? Issues/Problems are submitted to
the LNPAWG by filling out Problems/Issues Management (PIM) which can be
found on the NPAC Website (http://www.npac.com/).
September 9, 2006 19
1. What criteria does the group use to determine whether to work
the issue or not if any? When a PIM is presented to the LNPAWG, a
discuss takes place to determine if it is a number portability
problem/issue, the magnitude of the problem/issue, can it be
worked/resolved by the LNPAWG or does it need to be referred to another
committee and then tracked by the LNPAWG, etc.
2. How do you know when that issue will be placed on the agenda
to work? If time permits, we put it on the current agenda or placed on
the agenda for the next time we meet which at this time is monthly.
Starting in 2006 the LNPAWG will meet every other month as follows:
January, March, May, July, September, and November.
3. What is the process for working an issue and subsequently
gaining a conclusion to an issue? Group discussion, presentation of
different options/solutions in order to reach consensus. If the
issue/problem falls within the responsibility of another industry committee
then the LNPAWG will forward the issue/problem the appropriate industry
committees for input and/or resolution.
4. When the issue is completed, what are the communication
vehicles used to provide input to the industry? When the
issue/problem is resolved the outcome is documented on the PIM and
placed on the NPAC Website. In addition the resolution may also be
placed in the Number Portability Best Practices Matrix, presented to the
NANC and FCC for their support.
September 9, 2006 20
Billing and Collections WG
The NANC’s Billing and Collection Agent Oversight Working Group (B&C WG) is
responsible for overseeing the performance of the functional requirements
provided by the NANP Billing and Collection Agent (B&C Agent). The B&C WG will
investigate/review the performance of B&C Agent and submit reports at each
NANC meeting to fully inform NANC of the B&C Agent’s performance with respect
to the functional requirements. At the request of the FCC and/or NANC, the B&C
WG will identify and determine the financial impact, feasibility and/or the
appropriateness of initiatives/activities that may need to be included in the
budget or use these Funds.
The WG will participate in the development of the budget, contribution factor
and payment computation; monitor the billing, collection, and distribution of
funds; review for completeness the B&C Agent’s NANC Reports and Quarterly
reports used to confirm established procedures and records are properly
maintained to ensure operational integrity and; perform an annual Performance
Evaluation and co-develop corrective action plans and other change management
initiatives as required.
• Perform an annual performance evaluation. Participate in the development
of any corrective action plans and/or performance metrics/monitoring that
may be necessary during the year or as a result of the annual
• Identify/address any industry or vendor concerns with the performance of
the functional requirements during the year and upon NANC’s approval of
the Annual Performance Evaluation.
• Co-develop and track monthly performance metrics, including internal
performance metrics as appropriate. Report monthly performance to
NANC at bi-monthly NANC meetings.
• Co-develop the format and contents of the NANC report and preview
same prior to each NANC with Welch to ensure completeness and to
address any concerns. The WG will approve the format of the report
used to confirm established procedures and records are properly
maintained to ensure operational integrity.
September 9, 2006 21
• Co-develop the format and contents of the Quarterly report and
preview the same with Welch prior to its distribution to NANC to
ensure completeness. B&C WG to address any performance and/or
operational integrity concerns as is done with the NANC reports.
Fund Size and Contribution Factor
• Participate in arriving at the budget and Fund Size and ensure
disbursements by Welch are made only with proper authorization by
the FCC and/or NANC.
• Be involved in the review/approval process for the formula and
calculation of the contribution factor - the formula is used to arrive at
the contribution factor and must be filed with the FCC.
September 9, 2006 22
Numbering Oversight WG (NOWG)
The Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) holds a monthly review with the
NANPA and is beginning separate monthly meetings with the PA in 2005. The NANPA
standing agenda shown in Attachment 1 illustrates the level of interaction and
cooperation between the two groups. This agenda will be modified for use by the
NOWG and the PA. In addition to overseeing the activities and reviewing the
performances of numbering administrators, the NANPA the WG also holds frequent
conference calls and face-to-face meetings to carry out other NANC and FCC requests
and responsibilities in addition to the duties described below:
Analysis and review of PA/NANPA proposed Change Orders
Provide summary and analysis to NANC for consideration
• Proposed Tools: Change Order Tracking Report (see Attachment 2)
Internal Performance Metrics
• Review internal performance metrics reported results and ensure they are
effectively measuring performance.
• Assist and recommend performance metrics for tracking the NANPA and PA to
capture current performance issues
• Work with NANPA and/or PA to resolve documented issues per direction
provided by the NANC and the FCC.
• Work with NANPA and PA to ensure performance metrics are focused on
relevant data points to cover critical aspects of administration
• Proposed Tools: NANPA and PA Quality Assurance Reports
Number Administrator Complaints
• Review/assist with resolution of NANPA and PA complaints filed via the
administrators web site or forwarded by interested parties to NOWG
• Monitor complaints for identification of areas that may need to be addressed
through changes in industry guidelines and associated processes or requiring
further discussion by the FCC and the NANC for guidance on resolution.
Performance Improvement plans (PIP)
September 9, 2006 23
• Review and approve PIP to address agreed upon (NANC/FCC) administrative
• Monitor implementation progress of areas identified needing improvement
• Proposed Tools: NANPA and PA Performance Improvement Plan (PIP)
• Develop annual survey content with input from NANPA, PA, NANC, FCC and
• Evaluate input and survey results
• Document and prepare report analysis of PA/NANPA annual performance
• Conduct site visits for annual Operational Review
• Proposed Tools: Annual Survey; Operational Reviews; Written Observation
September 9, 2006 24
What Is An Issue Management Group (IMG)?
IMGs are ad hoc groups formed by NANC to work specific issues that may not be
appropriate or practical to assign to an existing Working Group.
What is a IMB Member Responsibilities?
• Be a liaison between your company and the IMG Group
• Attend scheduled meetings
• Review issues and provide feedback to the IMG Group
• Provided written verbiage for an IMG report
What Does an IMG Develop?
• IMGs develop draft recommendations in the IMG report for the NANC
consideration on specific issues, which NANC can accept, reject, change,
or remand back to the IMG with additional direction. Once NANC approves
the final IMG report, it sends the report on to the FCC.
What Type Of Issues Are Reviewed By An IMG?
• Abbreviated Dialing For One Call Notification (811) - The Abbreviated
Dialing for One Call Notification Issue Management Group, (a.k.a. DIG IMG)
was formed by NANC to identify and analyze the impact of employing various
abbreviated dialing alternatives that could be used to implement the Pipeline
Safety Improvement Act of 2002.
• Report on The Technical Viability of Increasing the Pooling
Contamination Threshold - The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) on October 24, 2002 asked the North American Numbering Council
(NANC) to evaluate the technical viability of increasing the contamination
threshold for blocks to be donated to number pools from 10 to 25 percent.
September 9, 2006 25
Industry Numbering Committee
The Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solution’s (ATIS) Industry Numbering
Committee (INC) provides an open forum to address and resolve telecommunications
industry-wide issues associated with the planning, administration, allocation,
assignment and use of North American Numbering Plan (NANP) numbering resources
and related dialing considerations for public telecommunications within the NANP area.
The INC was formed in 1993 to provide a single forum to work numbering related
The INC will work any issue submitted and accepted in accordance with its issue
acceptance procedures outlined below that are associated with the planning
administration, allocation, assignment and use of NANP resources including related
dialing considerations within the NANP area, irrespective of any technology.
The INC guidelines are used by the North American Numbering Plan Administrator, the
Pooling Administrator, service providers and vendors in the United States and to some
extent throughout the NANP. As an open industry forum, any interested or materially-
affected party can become a member of the INC. Both federal and state regulators also
refer to INC outputs developed via a consensus basis by INC subject matter experts.
Final INC Guidelines are also available to the public via the ATIS INC website. NANC
members have access to the secure area of the website from the ATIS INC
Administrator upon request. (www.atis.org)
What is the process to submit an Issue?
The process for the submission and working of INC Issues is driven by ATIS Operating
Procedures (http://www.atis.org/atisop.pdf) which provide for uniform issue submission
procedures across all ATIS forums. An ATIS Issue Identification Form must be
completed by the Issue Champion in order for a new Issue to be introduced into an
ATIS Forum or Committee. This form can be found in Appendix F of the ATIS Operating
Procedures. An Issue Champion may be an ATIS Member Company Representative or a
Forum or Committee participant. Any issue that requires expedited handling should be
brought to the attention of the Committee and Sub-Committee leadership.
What criteria does INC use to determine whether to work the Issue?
Once an Issue is submitted, the INC must determine whether to accept the Issue based
on the following criteria:
• The Issue is clearly defined via the ATIS Issue Identification Form (Appendix F);
September 9, 2006 26
• The Issue is within the scope of the Forum or Committee; and
• There is no existing solution or the existing solution can be enhanced to gain
efficiencies, i.e., operational, functionality, etc.
If an issue is not within the scope of the INC as defined by its Mission Statement, it will
usually seek to refer that issue to another Committee or Forum for resolution. Other
ATIS forums that INC regularly corresponds with include the ATIS Ordering and Billing
Forum, the ATIS Emergency Services Interconnection Forum and the ATIS Network
Interconnection and Interoperability Forum.
How do you know when an Issue will be placed on the agenda to be worked?
During General Session, newly-accepted Issues are assigned by INC consensus to one
of the INC’s Subcommittees. An Issue is placed on the Sub-committee agenda by the
co-chairs and the agenda is approved by consensus of the Sub-committee members.
Subcommittee members have the ability, via consensus, to include or exclude any Issue
for discussion on the agenda. Issues are prioritized to ensure efficient and timely
completion of industry priorities. If an issue requires expedited handling, the Issue
champion should contact the leadership of the Committee and Subcommittee.
What is the process for working an Issue and subsequently gaining a
conclusion to an Issue?
Once an Issue is accepted, the Issue is automatically placed into Active Status and
addressed via the submission of Contributions by the Issue champion and by other INC
members in an effort to reach final resolution. The status of an Issue is indicated by
one of the following categories:
Active: An Issue that has been accepted and is currently being addressed.
Initial Closure: An Issue that has reached consensus resolution. The purpose of Initial
Closure is to provide the industry an opportunity to review the resolution prior to the
Issue being placed into Final Closure.
Issues in Initial Closure can be removed from the Initial Closure status and placed back
into Active status when the INC decides the proposed resolution needs additional work.
Initial Pending: An Issue that has been placed into Initial Closure may be automatically
moved into the Initial Pending category as long as 21 calendar days have passed since
the Issue’s Initial Closure resolution was posted on the ATIS Web Site and notification
of Initial Closure was distributed via the email exploder list, if one of the following
Prior to the time that the Issue would go to Final Closure, new and substantive
information that directly impacts the resolution is brought to the attention of the INC;
or if the INC determines that it is appropriate to hold the Issue in the Initial Pending
September 9, 2006 27
category in anticipation of the output of another industry group, regulatory body or
In either of the above situations, the INC shall subsequently determine, via consensus,
if the Issue should be revisited, in which case it would be placed in the Active category;
or go to Final Closure if no further work is required, as long as 21 calendar days have
passed since the Issue’s Initial Closure resolution was posted on the ATIS Web Site and
notification of Initial Closure was distributed via the email exploder list.
Final Closure: An Issue is automatically placed into Final Closure provided:
21 calendar days have passed since the Issue’s Initial Closure resolution was posted on
the ATIS Web Site and notification of Initial Closure was distributed via email exploder
no new information surfaces that would require the Issue to be placed into the Active of
Initial Pending category.
Withdrawn: An Issue that was accepted by the INC and later withdrawn pursuant to the
consensus agreement of the INC.
Tabled: An Issue that has been addressed by the INC, but cannot be further pursued
until additional information becomes available.
No Industry Agreement: No Industry Agreement exists when the INC is unable to reach
consensus on the resolution of the Issue. If this situation should occur, the ATIS Issue
Identification Form should document that the INC could not agree on a resolution and
state the alternative viewpoints with the pros and cons of each. In this situation, the
Issue will be closed under the category, “No Industry Agreement.”
When the Issue is completed, what are the communication vehicles used to
provide input to the industry?
Two weeks after an Issue has been placed into Initial Closure, it is posted on the ATIS
INC Web Site and is forwarded to the INC exploder list. The INC exploder list is made
up of INC members and other selected industry participants. Likewise, when an Issue
goes to Final Closure it follows a similar path. NOTE: Once an Issue goes to Final
Closure, the associated changes are incorporated into the applicable Guideline(s). The
Guidelines that have been updated by an Issue going into Final Closure are published
two weeks after the Issue is placed into Final Closure. All INC Guidelines are effective
on the date of publication to the INC website.
The following demonstrates how INC Issue 465 was handled beginning to end.
September 9, 2006 28
1. Proposed INC Issue “NXX Codes Returned in Error,” was accepted at General
Session per the issue acceptance procedures and assigned INC Issue Number
465 on January 31, 2005, at INC 80. It was assigned to the INC CO/NXX
Subcommittee for work.
2. The CO/NXX Subcommittee met later that week on February 2. Due to the
Subcommittee’s work load, the Subcommittee chose to defer work on this Issue
until INC 81.
3. On April 6, the CO/NXX Subcommittee worked Issue 465 and its associated
contribution CO/NXX-317- Amend Section 9.3.1 of COCAG Under Declaration of
Jeopardy. A proposed resolution was drafted and the Issue was placed into
Initial Closure on April 7, 2005.
4. On April 22, 2005, the Issue and its proposed resolution were posted to the ATIS
INC Web Site and notification was sent to the INC exploder list.
5. On May 5, 2005, the INC Administrator received notification from an INC
member regarding new information pertaining to the proposed changes
contained in the Issue that were substantive in nature. The Issue was placed
into Initial Pending status until the INC could review it further. INC leadership
discussed with the objector and Issue originator whether the objection should
wait until the next regularly scheduled meeting of the INC or whether an interim
meeting via conference call should be scheduled to discuss the objection. An
interim conference call meeting was scheduled.
6. On May 27, 2005, the INC held an interim CO/NXX Subcommittee call to review
and discuss the Issue. The proposed changes were agreed to and made to the
proposed resolution statement. Immediately following the CO/NXX Subcommittee
call, a duly announced INC General Session call was held and the Issue was
placed into Final Closure.
September 9, 2006 29
AT&T administered shared numbering resources such as area codes until divestiture of
the Bell System in 1984, when these functions were transferred to Bellcore under the
Plan of Reorganization. On October 9, 1997, the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC), acting on a recommendation of the North American Numbering Council (NANC),
named Lockheed Martin to serve as administrator of the North American Numbering
Plan (NANPA). In December of 1999, NANPA was transitioned from Lockheed Martin to
NeuStar. In July 2003, the FCC selected NeuStar through a competitive bid to serve as
NANPA for another five-year term.
Regulatory authorities in various North American Numbering Plan countries have named
national administrators to oversee the numbering resources assigned by NANPA for use
within their countries. NeuStar is the national administrator for the United States (U.S.) and
its territories. Science Applications International Corp. Canada serves as the Canadian
Numbering Administrator. In other participating countries, regulatory authorities either
serve as the national administrator or delegate the responsibility to the dominant carrier.
NANPA, in its overall coordinating role, consults with and provides assistance to
regulatory authorities and national administrators to ensure that numbering resources
are used in the best interests of all participants in the North American Numbering Plan.
NANPA is not a policy-making entity. In making assignment decisions, NANPA follows
regulatory directives and industry-developed guidelines. The North American
Numbering Council via its Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) provides
continuous oversight of NANPA on behalf of the NANC and evaluates NANPA’s
performance each year.
NANPA has three core responsibilities: administration of North American Numbering
Plan resources, coordination of area code relief planning, and collection of utilization
and forecast data from service providers.
Resource administration includes receiving and processing applications for assignment,
making and recording assignments, reclaiming resources no longer needed, and
keeping the industry informed as the supply of available resources approaches exhaust.
The scope of code administration includes these numbering resources:
• Numbering plan area (NPA) codes:
• Central office codes;
September 9, 2006 30
• PCS/N00 codes (500-NXX);
• 900-NXX codes;
• 555-XXXX line numbers;
• Carrier identification codes (CICs);
• International inbound NPA 456-NXX codes;
• 800 855-XXXX line numbers;
• ANI II digits (Automatic Number Identification Information Integers); and
• Vertical service codes.
Area code relief planning
NPA relief planning precedes the introduction of new geographic area codes. At least
36 months before the anticipated exhaust of an NPA in the U.S. or its territories,
NANPA’s relief planners notify the industry and state regulatory commission of the
impending exhaust and facilitate a process for the industry to reach consensus on a
plan to relieve the exhaust NPA. The relief planner submits this plan on behalf of the
industry to the state regulatory commission for approval.
Number Resource Utilization and Forecast (NRUF) Reporting
The collection of utilization and forecast data, known as Number Resource Utilization
and Forecast (NRUF) Reporting, has been in effect since the FCC’s Number Resource
Optimization Order in 2000. NANPA is charged with collecting and reporting this data.
Service providers are required to report utilization and forecast data twice a year.
Utilization data includes the quantity of assigned, intermediate, aging, administrative
and reserved numbers. Forecast data typically includes a five year forecast of the
quantity of thousands blocks and/or codes by rate center. The FCC NRO Order also
required access to disaggregated NRUF data by state regulatory commissions and
heightened reporting enforcement, including the responsibility to withhold numbering
resources from service providers that fail to file utilization and forecast reports. This
data is also used as input into NANPA’s semi-annual projections of NPA and NANP
NANPA work is performed under an FCC contract on a fixed-price basis. Costs
associated with the administration of shared numbering resources are allocated to
participating countries based on population, and then further adjusted based on NANPA
services used by each country. Participants pay only their share of the costs of the
NANPA services they require. Regulatory authorities in each participating country
determine how to recover these costs.
The NANPA website, www.nanpa.com, is the primary public source of numbering
information. The website focuses on the primary functions performed by NANPA. The
site provides a complete description of the different services offered by NANPA, all of
the various numbering resources administered by NANPA, including a description of
September 9, 2006 31
their use and links to their associated administration guidelines, can easily be accessed
via the website. Area code maps, planning letters, newsletters and other NANPA
publications are readily available. The NANPA website is also the gateway into the
NANP Administration System (NAS), the system used by NANPA and the industry to
request and receive numbering resources. The website also makes available numerous
downloadable reports on the various resources NANPA it administers. Many of the
reports were made available real-time, providing the most up-to-date source on
NANP Administration System (NAS)
The NANP Administration System enables service providers, regulators and other
interested parties to have the capability to submit resource requests, provide number
utilization and forecast data, obtain resource reports and receive notifications
concerning number administration. The capabilities of NAS are summarized below:
• Service providers may enter and submit the Central Office Code Part 1s, MTEs, and
Part 4s through a secure, web-based system.
• Service providers may enter and submit via the secure web-based system the
appropriate applications forms for 500-NXXs, 900-NXXs, 456-NXXs, Carrier
Identification Codes, 555 line numbers and 800-855 line numbers.
• In addition to submitting utilization and forecast data (i.e., NRUF) via email and File
Transfer Protocol (FTP), NAS provides service providers the capability to submit this
information online, to include providing updates to this data throughout the
• Interested parties may receive notifications on such items as changes to assignment
guidelines, NRUF requirements, report availability, client education and system
maintenance and availability. Notifications will also be available on a state-by-state
basis, providing information about NPA relief planning activities, jeopardy
notifications and state-specific regulatory activities.
• State commissions have online access to service-provider submitted utilization and
forecast data provided via NRUF for their respective area codes.
September 9, 2006 32
NATIONAL THOUSANDS BLOCK POOLING ADMINISTRATOR
The national thousands-block Pooling Administrator (PA) is a contractor selected by the
FCC, that administers the thousands-block pooling administration function. The
contract was competitively bid for a possible total of five years, and is renewable
annually. The first PA contract was awarded to NeuStar, Inc. on June 15, 2001.
Thousands-block number pooling involves breaking up the 10,000 numbers in a central-
office code (NXX) into ten sequential blocks of 1,000 numbers each, and potentially
allocating each thousands-block to a different service provider, and possibly a different
switch, within the same rate center. All 10,000 numbers available in the NXX code are
allocated within one rate center, but can be allocated to multiple service providers in
thousand-number blocks, instead of only to one particular service provider.
The PA’s responsibilities are delineated in:
(1) Section C: Thousands-Block Pooling Contractor Technical
Requirements, dated November 30, 2000,
(2) NeuStar’s response to the Request for Proposal (RFP),
(3) FCC rules, and (4) industry guidelines.
Those responsibilities include:
implementation of pooling in all area codes according to FCC and state
orders and directives
establishment and maintenance of industry pools
assignment of thousands blocks
maintenance of the Pooling Administration System (PAS)
evaluation and forecasting for rate center pools to ensure a six-month supply
avoiding the opening of unnecessary codes
allocating thousands blocks to authorized pool participants
replenishing industry inventory pools
receiving service provider block donations
reclaiming thousands blocks
coordinating requests for full codes with NANPA CO Code Administration as
participating in industry forums
implementing federal and state regulatory agency directives
following industry guidelines
September 9, 2006 33
Public information about number pooling and the PA can be found on the website,
www.nationalpooling.com. The pooling website is used for access into the PAS, the
system used by the PA and the industry to request, receive, and manage numbering
resources. In addition, the website makes the following information about pooling
Reports on such topics as assigned and available blocks, rate center files and
changes, and PA monthly reports to the FCC.
PA Tips of the Month
New Service Provider Checklist
PAS User Manuals
PA Annual Report
PAS User Registration and Login
PA Contact Information
Pooling Administration System (PAS)
The Pooling Administration System (PAS) enables registered users, including service
providers and regulators, to submit requests for thousands-blocks, provide forecast
data, obtain resource reports, and receive notifications concerning number
Industry Pooling Guidelines
The Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions’ (ATIS) Industry Numbering
Committee (INC) establishes guidelines for the administration of thousands-block
number pooling. The following are links to pooling-related documents:
Thousands-Block Pooling Administration:
Location Routing Number (LRN) Assignment:
September 9, 2006 34
Welch & Co.
How did we acquire the job?
Welch & Company LLP replied to a request for proposals, and won the contract. Our
contract with the FCC began October 1, 2004 and expires on September 30, 2009.
Mission / Scope /Role
Welch & Company acts as the Billing & Collection Agent for the North American
Numbering Plan. Our duties are as follows:
1 - Contribution factor / Budget
• Before the start of fiscal year, we prepare a budget of the costs to be funded for
the following fiscal year which we review with the B&C working group for their
review and approval.
• We then receive revenue data from the data collection agent and from there
determine the contribution factor which we review with working group for review
• We then file a report of the contribution factor with the FCC for approval.
2 – Invoicing carriers
• The data collection agent (USAC) sends us revenue information they have
collected from carriers who file the 499A report.
• Based on the contribution factor and the revenue information, we send out
annual invoices to the carriers. Carriers who owe amounts in excess of $1,200
are entitled to pay monthly instead of annually.
3 – Payments from the fund
• The FCC has contracts with various vendors. When we receive an approved
invoice from the FCC, we pay the invoice, generally by wire transfer.
4 – Reporting
• We send reports to the FCC on a regular basis regarding the accounting records.
We prepare bi-monthly reports for the NANC meetings. The B&C working group
approves these reports before we present to NANC.
September 9, 2006 35
Guidelines for Working Groups
September 9, 2006 36
Listing of Resources
The following is a list of websites and the information available.
www.nanpa.com is the official NANPA web site. Its contents include:
• Assignment listings for NANP numbering resources, including area codes, carrier
identification codes, N11 codes, and vertical service codes.
• Relief planning information for the U.S. and its territories, including a status
chart, planning letters, and press releases.
• Central office code assignment information for the U.S. and its territories.
• Contact information for numbering resources.
• Jeopardy procedures.
• Information for NRUF submissions.
• U.S. area code maps.
www.cnac.ca is the Canadian Numbering Administrator’s site. This site is the master
reference for Canadian number assignment information and includes Canadian
numbering information similar to that provided by www.nanpa.com for the U.S. and its
www.fcc.gov is the FCC’s web site. Of particular interest are:
www.fcc.gov/wcb - the home page of the Wireline Competition Bureau. Orders
related to numbering topics, including the Number Resource Optimization (NRO)
orders, can be found here.
www.fcc.gov/wcb/tapd/Nanc - the home page for the North American
Numbering Council (NANC), a federal advisory committee of the FCC that
provides analysis and recommendations to the FCC on numbering issues. This
site contains their charter, meeting minutes, and membership lists.
wireless.fcc.gov/rules.html - the FCC rules and regulations are codified in Title 47
of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). This page links to the current edition
of the CFR.
www.crtc.gc.ca is the site for the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications
Commission, the Canadian regulator.
www.nanc-chair.org is the home page for the Chair of the NANC. It contains
presentations and reports provided to the NANC on issues currently being addressed by
www.atis.org is the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) site. It
has several sections of interest for numbering. Of particular interest is the Industry
September 9, 2006 37
Numbering Committee (INC). All finalized INC documents are available for download,
including assignment guidelines for numbering resources.
You can access INC documents, including the Central Office Code Administration
(COCAG), Thousand Block Pooling Administration (TBPAG) and Carrier Identification
Code (CIC) guidelines, with the following link: www.atis.org/inc/docs.asp
www.itu.int is the home page of the International Telecommunications Union in
Geneva, the group that sets international standards for telephone numbers. Although
much of the information on the site is available to ITU members only, some documents
are available to all, including a list of assigned country codes.
www.naruc.org is the home page of the National Association of Regulatory Utility
Commissioners. NARUC has five (5) sitting members on the NANC and its committees
frequently take positions on numbering issues. Links to all of the state commissions’
web sites can be found at this site.
www.nationalpooling.com is official site for the National Pooling Administrator (PA).
Its contents include:
I New Service Provider Checklist
N PAS User Registration
P Help Desk Contact Information
H PAS User Manuals
P Pooling Reports such as:
o Blocks Assigned and Blocks Available by NPA
o Rate Centers by NPA and their pooling status
R Contact information for Pooling Administration staff
C Reclamation Procedures
R Regulatory Contacts for safety valve and other numbering issues
R PA Tips of the Month
P Links to various documents
www.npac.com is the site for the Number Portability Administration Center or NPAC.
The NPAC facilitates local number portability, the ability to change your service provider
while retaining your number.
September 9, 2006 38
ADFO Alternate Designated Federal Officer
ANI II Automatic Number Identification Information Integers
ATIS Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions
B&C Billing and Collection
B&C WG Billing and Collection Working Group
CIC Carrier Identification Codes
CO Central Office
COCAG Central Office Code Administration Guidelines
DFO Designated Federal Officer
ENUM Electronic Numbering
ESIF Emergency Services Interconnection Forum
FACA Federal Advisory Committee Act
FCC Federal Communications Commission
FoN Future of Numbering
FRS Functional Requirements Specification
GSA General Services Administration
IIS Interoperable Interface Specification
IMG Issue Management Group
INC Industry Numbering Committee
LNP Local Number Portability
LNPA Local Number Portability Administration
LNPA WG Local Number Portability Administration Working Group
LRN Location Routing Number
MTE Months To Exhaust
NANC North American Numbering Council
NANP North American Numbering Plan
NANPA North American Numbering Plan Administrator
NAPM North American Portability Management
NARUC National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners
NAS NANP Administration System
NASUCA National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates
NIIF Network Interconnection Interoperability Forum
NOWG Numbering Oversight Working Group
NPA Number Planning Areas (Area Codes)
NPAC Number Portability Administration Center
NRUF Number Resource Utilization and Forecast
PA Pooling Administrator
PAS Pooling Administration System
PIM Problems Issue Management
PIP Performance Improvement Plans
SMS Service Management System
SMS/SCP Service Management System Service Control Point
TBPAG Thousands-Block Pooling Administration Guidelines
September 9, 2006 39
USAC Universal Service Administrative Company
VoIP Voice over IP
WG Working Group
Version Tracking Matrix
Version Release Date Modification
Version 1 March 14, 2006
Version 2 September 9, 2006 • Updated INC Mission
September 9, 2006 40