Published on: Mar 3, 2016
Transcripts - Nagaland pdf
Phizo's plebiscite speech
A.Z. Phizo, President,
NAGA NATIONAL COUNCIL,
16 May 1951.
Uncles, aunties, friends, brothers and sisters,
Today is a great day for our people. Throughout Nagaland our people are ceremoniously
observing this day May 16 as the day of our Plebiscite Day, which we are going to record by
taking the thumb impression of our people. This we are doing to show India and the world of our
aspiration and that there is an effective unity of the people in Nagaland.
We have been living as a subject nation for the last 70 years. Our country was an Independent
country before the British conquered us with superior force of arms. The British left our country
and India in the year 1947. Without making any special arrangement for our country the British
abandoned us and we found ourselves under the mercy of the Indian people.
Our Naga people (the British subject Nagas) have demanded independence from the British on
many previous occasions. Unfortunately, we never put it on record as our people are not
accustomed to writing. The only written record submitted by our people to the British Government
was submitted in the year 1929 January 10 when “SIMON COMMMISSION”, under the
chairmanship of Sir John Simon, came here in Kohima seeking our people’s opinion about the
“New Reform” – as it was called. Our Naga people demand Independence and said, “LEAVE US
ALONE, AND WHEN YOU – the BRITISH - LEAVE US WE SHALL BE FREE AND
A long struggle has followed with the march of history and we have fully kept pace with it. When
the Japanese Imperial forces smashed the British defenses and reached Burma, some of us took
full advantage of it. The Japanese forces along with the Indian National Army, better known as the
INA, fully co-operated with us and as a result of our concerted action most of Nagaland as far as
Kohima was freed from the dominating control and influence of the British. In this connection, I
may say a word concerning strategy. Our country was and still is supposed to be a strategic area.
The experience of the last war (World War II) has belied this popular belief. Strategy depends
more upon the people, it is not merely a question of geography or location.
I am not going into details of our past experiences with India especially since 1947. Prior to the
transference by the British of their administrative authority and controlling over - that is, military
and police - into the hands of Indians, we had talked to the British for our Independence. But there
again we made a mistake. We had not put it in writing for record. Anyway, we the Naga people
declared ourselves Independent on the 14th of August, 1947, and on the same day we informed
India by telegram, and cabled to UNO for information and record.
Since then, we have tried to settle our political issue with India on various occasions. But we have
not been successful. As a result we have gathered here together in order to try to convince India
of our inherent right to be free and equal to any other nation as a distinct people. This time, and
from now on, we shall put everything into writing. We shall see to it that our talk do not end in
In the name of the NAGA NATIONAL COUNCIL and on behalf of the people and citizens of
NAGALAND I wish to make our stand and our national position perfectly clear. We are a
democratic people, and as such, we have been struggling for of a Separate Sovereign State of
Nagaland in a democratic way through constitutional means as it is so called. We shall continue to
On many occasions we have been accused by the press in India that we were a troublesome
people and that our “movement” for Independence must be stopped. Many Indian leaders told us
that we the Nagas are “Indians” and that Nagas can never be allowed to become independent.
Some Indian leaders say that even Hyderabad had to submit to the Indian union just as the rest of
the Indian princely States, which number over 500, had to submit.
When we examine those rapacious assertions, accusations and misapprehensions we find that
the Indians do not know the Nagas. India tried to stop our Independence, they are still trying; and,
they will probably continue to do so. The British tried to keep Indian independence in their own
hand. They thought they could remain in India forever to come, that was why they, the British, built
such cities as Bombay, Madras, Calcutta, Delhi and the rest of all the modern Indian towns and
cities. Roads were constructed, Railways were laid out, and Companies with capitals running into
millions of pounds in gold came into existence. All those are now in the hands and under the
authority of the Indians. Such is history. Simply because a strong people got the control of political
administration of a country over a weaker people it does not mean the end of history. The history
of progress and freedom has been written and will continue to be written. Most of the histories of
human freedom were recorded in human blood. Most of the foundations of free nations were built
on human bones and crushed skulls. But we want our national independence to remain holy and
pure. We do not want to mix freedom, and our independence, with human blood. We do hope we
shall not be compelled to live on a structure founded on human skulls and bones. We are
determined to extricate our self clear with understanding, by goodwill and through reason, so that
we may continue to live in freedom and enjoy national independence.
We want our Indian brothers and sisters to know that we are not their enemy. We want the world
to know that there is civilization in Nagaland. Academically backward though we may be, it is up to
us to show to the world that we are not a people which has lost its raison d’être. We are alive.
We never feared India; and, of course there is no reason for the Nagas to fear India in this human
struggle for maintaining our political independence. Just as much as you cannot see a black spot
in clear water, likewise, we cannot have a black spot of fear in our mind of clear conscience. I
always have a feeling that God, our Heavenly Father - our creator - is with us and guiding us.
What is there for us to fear? Only a murderer and people of evil intent can have fear and suspicion
in his mind. We do not belong to a criminal race. And there is no ground for the Nagas to be
worried or to fear the millions of Indians in this struggle to retain our Independence. We also
appeal to India to be sane and wise. We appeal to them that they should be human and not
brutes. We appeal to India to be a free people with a real feeling of independence in which there is
no place for suspicion or fear. The Nagas do not ask Independence from India; indeed, we do not
want anything from India. India has nothing to give away to Nagaland. We are Independent and
sovereign in our own national right. What we ask is not to interfere our administration but leave us
alone and allow Nagaland, the national state of the Nagas, to continue to exist in peace and make
progress without hindrance.
The present discord between Nagaland and India is not a natural consequence of inevitable
history conflict. It is the result of the break-up of the British Empire in the East and the issue is
entirely of British creation but more of the callousness of the British government toward the Asiatic
people of their contemptible subjects that we have been. Now that India is free, we appeal to them
to exercise their sovereign right to let the Nagas continue to remain free and independent which,
in verity, is in keeping with the precept of Mahatma Gandhi’s creed of “Non-violence”. Should we
seek a better example than of the British who granted political independence to India? The British
possessed India and ruled over it for a long period stretching over 200 years; whereas Nagaland,
it is not an Indian colony.
As for the question of race, the less we talk the better. It is an undeniable fact that the Nagas are
not Indian. We distinctly and unmistakably belong to the great Mongolian family. Strictly speaking,
the world has come to know that the question of nationality is not a question of racial purity of a
people. Also, the most important thing to consider is not merely one of politics but it is rather a
problem of biology and psychology. To live together in peace different people must have the same
attitude and the same feeling: there must be tolerance. Between the Indians and the Nagas, I am
sad to say, these are lacking. Nagas found it impossible to tolerate the Indians. This is our
experience in the last 70 years ever since our people came to know them. The Indians have no
human feeling in them and their attitude is anti-social. There are, undoubtedly, many good Indians
who understand us; but we do not live together with those good men.
The question whether the Nagas will or will not be allowed to maintain our independence remains
to be seen. If free India wishes to be a leader in this word’s affairs, particularly in Asian affairs,
India cannot sidestep the voice of Nagaland upholding the national right of the Nagas. It is not
merely a claim. If India honestly believes that “TRUTH TRIUMPHS” (which is inscribed in the
official Emblem of the Republic of India) the truth of Naga existence and the need of freedom
cannot be buried in secret. India cannot ignore the national state of Nagaland and continue talking
Mahatma Gandhi, Non-violence and Democracy.
The position of Nagaland and the Naga case have no comparison anywhere in the word where a
human race newly emancipated like India try usurp its neighbor country of a sovereign state like
Nagaland all because of the vast wealth of mineral of resources in our country which the
manumitted Indians have come to know and they wanted to grab it by any means. Leaving aside
the distinctiveness of our nation as a race and Nagaland as a country, our native right over our
own national territory that had been clearly demarcated 400 years ago cannot be superseded by
India. The Indians have no vested interest in our country and there is not a single Indian
nationality who owns an acre of land in our Nagaland. Prior to 1947, that is, when the British were
yet here, no Indian is allowed to enter Nagaland without a special permit and that good Regulation
(which was in force before Naga territory was annexed) still happily prevails up to this day.
If this world is to have peace and goodwill toward one another, the will of the people and nation
India puts forward various arguments in their attempt to confound us.
1. The first argument is about the “menace” of China and Burma. They always say this trying to
scare us which we do not have the least thing to worry.
2. The second argument is what they called “strategy” for security of India. Just as much as India
needs precaution for her security other countries also require the same precaution. At Least,
Nagaland cannot permit India to build up military strategy in our country against Burma or China
whose people are our own blood relatives. We have another neighbor in the south west which is
Pakistan. We have no quarrel with them. Whether China, Burma or Pakistan, these neighbors
have not given us any trouble and we are certain that they have no evil design to annex Nagaland.
Whatever it is, we cannot allow India to build up military defense in Nagaland not only against our
good neighbors but for our own safety as well. Our country can easily become a graveyard and
we, on our part, are determined to prevent it.
3. The third Indian argument is about economy. The Indians say that Nagaland cannot maintain
itself economically as if we are a sort of just crawling out from a hole. Their talk is nothing but
insult. The truth is, Nagaland had never been dependent on India at any time in history. These are
problems decent people do not argue and try to grab other people’s territory. In matters of
maintenance, or to be more precise, the question of finance for a state, I cannot do any better
than quote His Excellency Shri C. Rajagopalachari (the former Indian Governor-General known to
all of us) who said in his famous book the “Reconciliation” “The notion that any State can be self-sufficient in resources is illusory. It is born of the habit of
thinking in terms of property. Sovereignty does not exclude trade and communications and
commerce. The right to rule one-self should not be mixed up with economic Independence.”
Fortunately, Nagaland is a surplus country in matters of food and in other daily necessities that
makes life happier. We have a vast area of Oil deposit and we have been burning oil long before
the British appeared in our country. The Indian government have already brought in other
foreigners of Oil drillers and Geologists and they have shamelessly started exploiting our oil
resources. Many of you have seen, and all of you know that drilling has been going on in
Chumukedima, 37 miles from here. Drilling is being carried out against our strong protest. We
hope it shall not turn out to be another Anglo-Iranian sort of affairs. The position is very serious.
We have foreseen the danger long before. There are coal deposits throughout Nagaland. The
present coal mine is only a small fraction what we have. For oil we just dig with hand and draw
out, that is why we call it “digged-water” (to Tzu). Our people still continue manufacture salt for
culinary purpose for its effect on health though not on the same scale as in the ancient days due
to cheap salt in the market which are imported. Yet we need not import even salt in this
landlocked State of ours. We have mica, gas, lime, iron ores, nickel and many other essential
materials for which India has an eye on our land.
What worries us is not poverty as every one of our citizens knows this fact. Overabundance in
natural resources of modern military which exist in our country so plentifully causes us much
concern. The simple fact is that Nagaland is not yet internationally recognized and free India is
trying to take advantage of us.
The Indians insolently told us that China and Communism may take possession of Nagaland
sooner or later; therefore, India must occupy it first! This line of argument is grossly vulgar on their
part. Simply because India is afraid that China may take possession of Nagaland or “may come to
wield influence over the Nagas,” as they say, will it be the right thing for India to deny us our
birthright and deprived us our independence. ?
Being a nation the Nagas have their own distinct way of manners and living; and it is quite
possible that we think differently in many respects.
In our country, land belongs to the people as private property, and every family possesses land.
We uphold every person as sovereign: man and women alike. Every family is a landlord; but,
there is no landlordism in Nagaland.
Democracy is the very spirit in our country. Land being so owned by the people who are in their
person sovereign, there is a sound economic basis and there is no room for anyone to grudge or
complain against social injustice. If our Naga civilization is not destroyed there is no possibility for
any section of our people to become servile or entirely dependent on someone.
Over and above these, the system of our Naga community organization, which is rooted in the
humane principle of individual responsibility, sharing collectively the common weal and woe
together, had stood the test of time without waver throughout those centuries of great changes.
The system I refer to is our village and community - group (Thino) organization. Who is there
among us who does not feel proud of this national institution of ours? The organization is not only
a social system of a kind. Our community-group system is a living and dynamic institution which
makes you love your country and your nation so intensely. Out of this we grow and our society
generates a spontaneous feeling that gives you real sense of happiness. There is a compelling
sense of responsibility in us toward our fellow citizens which our people happily share in common.
It arouses a joyous urge to be of service to others and give our help the best possible. Do our
people feel satiated with life ? This had not been our experience. We are very happy as we are.
We feel joyous with our social institutions and we want to safeguard it and preserve it. It is
precious to us.
We never hear suicide in Nagaland. There must be a reason. Not only in youth alone but you are
never a finished product even in your old age because there is an undiminished consciousness of
the social link of youthful bloom in the perpetual companionate association with your fellow man
day after day, month after month and with the change of seasons without end, singing even in
your work regardless of how heavy the work may be. In fact, the heavier the work the more joyous
we sing together. In all things, your community-groups stand by you, laugh and cry with you, so
you are with them, throughout life. You enjoy your life’s span till the last day comes to leave this
earth. Was there any Naga who was ever abandoned on the day he died? Not that we know of
even a single instance, it is unthinkable to our society: because we are a proud people, proud in
the sense that we respect human personality, the personality that makes the fragile man
altogether a different creature from the rest of powerful animals.
To abandon the dead is irreligious, a dishonor to the Creator. To ignore the living is still worse, it is
a disgrace to the community and nation. It mocks human personality. Indifference toward human
personality, the abode of man’s soul, is not only ignominy to our society’s viewpoint (themia pese
kechü-a kenyü) but it inflicts injury to one’s sense of love and justice which are the hallmark of a
We do not like to mention about the Indians at all at any time. We have nothing to do with them.
But it is only for them alone that we are taking all these unnecessary troubles. The Indians
repeatedly tell us that we cannot manage our national state, and all that. But what we see in
India? Their dead bodies are abandoned to the jackals in the fields. Those who die in the
hospitals, even their own relatives very often refuse to claim them! Millions of their sons and
daughters are pitifully roaming about in the streets in their awful cities begging and stealing. Why?
No work, no land, no self-respect. The more sturdy woman becomes prostitute and even then it is
considered as an honourable profession to give happiness to their male population. The Indian
mind greatly differ from the way we judge things. We refer to their society, their national
characteristics, and not to the weakness of individual person. And this is not to traduce them but
they must know that Nagas are not ‘fools’ to be bluffed or frightened to give away their fatherland.
Their society is absolutely their own concern. We thought helpless humanity is to be pitied
whatever race they may belong to; but when these hopeless race wanted to grab our national
state and usurp our birthright by sheer force of preponderant might, why! it is entirely a different
matter. It is a challenge to human integrity. No amount of sacrifice is too high to save one’s
national honour and preserve one’s hearth and home so that the posterity may continue to live in
honour and in peace and enjoy their birthright.
NAGAS DO NOT WANT to be associated with, much less to become citizens, of a people who
have no sense of human honour in their make-up, and no human compassion even toward their
own sons and daughters. We must yet believe that the Indian leaders will adhere to Mahatma
Gandhi’s doctrine of “Non-violence” and fulfill Gandhiji’s promise to the Nagas that India will not
attack the Nagas; yet, Mahatma Gandhi is no more. And, we must look into the background of the
Indian civilization and see the heart of their people: the core of nationhood in being.
It is a practice in India to kill their daughters because they cannot marry them; that means, they
have no tolerance, no consideration even toward womanhood who the very fountain of their
posterity. Their men are so selfish that they will not marry unless the wife to be brings wealth
which they call “dowry” for the price of marrying her, and, it is almost always the case the girl does
not know the man who it to be her husband. A man old enough to be her grandfather is often
represented to her as a handsome young boy. That is the way the Indian do business and they
consider such tactics as skillfulness! The selfishness reveals more tragically on the last day the
man leaves this world. His wife is burned alive on his funeral pyre. All these go to prove that the
core of their heart or the basis of their civilization is intolerant.
What we see in other established institutions in Indian? In their Courts of law the learned Lawyers
are there whose profession is to defend their clients. To defend another person is a most noble
mission, but instead of looking to the human side of helping and defending their clients it become
rather a general practice to mulct their clients through various dubious means who place
themselves at their mercy ready to bead and pay any fee within their means. This is especially
done by dragging the cases calling it ‘postponement’ and the law become expensive for the poor;
thus, the lawyers failed in their responsibility never trying to obtain a quick decision. Or all the
professions, the Lawyers and the Pleaders hold the highest respect in the Indian society, but
these learned man instruct their clients to tell lies to outwit their opponents. This learned and noble
profession was so prostituted that the former British regime in our country never allowed the
Indian lawyers to come to Court of law in “Naga Hills Excluded Area” and our Naga people have
been saved from the immoral practice of telling lies to deceive one’s opponents like in India. And
we are to take note that almost every Indian leader is a lawyer, and these learned people, who
search for a flaw in legal system or try to produce one when there is none, are the leaders of their
great country today. This is the danger. We already see their tactics.
In the “Charitable Hospitals” also the Indian doctors are there who see the patients as a diseased
body and not as fellow human beings who need one’s tender care. Every one of us knew all
these. What is the lot of the Indian cultivators? They are mere tenants in their own soil and not the
sovereign owners of their own land as in our country. Most of the Indians live in rented houses in
all the towns and cities though they may appear to the onlookers as ‘big gentlemen’ behaving and
speaking very good English like the British. Leaving aside other considerations, the whole trouble
with the Indians is they are not trustworthy. They never keep their word. In the last World War II
also our people have been cheated crores (millions) of money in labour and contract works. Many
of you have suffered tens of thousands of rupees and you have failed to recover it.
What substance is there in the India civilization? Anything to yearn for? The Indians are not a
happy people. It may have nothing to do with race as much, but they have miserably failed to
develop a civilization that makes their people happy. We have nothing to do with them but we the
Nagas do not want them to disturb us. We dearly love our pristine nationhood which should not be
tarnished with a world splitting culture, which divides man, and not unite them.
We would not have gone to the extent of mentioning all these about the India society and about
their country what is patently knows to everyone of us so long ago had they not shamelessly told
us again and again that the Nagas cannot exist without India! We do not like to talk about India: let
them be anything, we simple do not need them and we do not want them. A self-respecting people
understand these human feelings but we have to watch India. We hear the Indians say in Shillong
: “Naga log machines gun-se khatam kardena hoga.” (The Nagas shall have to be finished by
Whereas Nagaland ought to have enjoyed unruffled peace for generations to come without end,
being surrounded by world’s biggest nations around us (in matters of human population), it is
unfortunate that the Indians, who alone are one-fifth of world population, seem to be determined to
quarrel with so small a nation even like us.
In 1879 the Indians came and killed our people as the British mercenary soldiers. There are our
fathers here standing among us today who personally saw the battle. In the last World War II
again how they behaved is fresh in your memory in spite of stern discipline under the British
officers. These are bygone experience. But, now that they are free and independent, and they
threaten us that they have three million men under arm, which is quite possibly as high as Five
million – if police force is included, these are terrible things even to hear them talk. We wanted to
avoid any sort of a clash if humanly possible. And, it remains to be seen what Indian Government
will do as the government of the one of the eldest family of civilized people on earth.
It is needless to say, we love to retain our Naga age-old culture of classless society as we are, in
the spirit of true sisterhood and as brothers to one another.
We like to follow our own form of civilization wherein one need not worry for his and her needs or
fear another person. Neither do our Naga society dehumanize another person and forced him or
her to resort to begging. We have no lawless problem to deal with and we are happy to see our
citizens for all these.
There is no death sentence in Nagaland and we must hope and work for it that this will continue.
Life to us represents prestige and honour: it is not merely an animal body of flesh and blood for
self-enjoyment. Life is such a serious matter that wanton killing can easily precipitate a local clash.
Even a small boy among us understands the implications that involve human integrity.
Being a democratic people, our Naga people are highly disciplined. This did not come easily, that
we all know. We are strong enough to be very individualistic but we also know that man cannot
live by himself alone. We had to abide by community and public opinion and our fathers struggled
hard for all these good things our nation enjoy today. We have learned that every individual citizen
has a responsibility toward others, not alone to be kindly but give our best possible help to each
other. Nagas uphold that every human being is sovereign and equally precious regardless of his
and her social position. We never needed police force to maintain peace, law and order because
we are ready to defend ourself and always ready to defend others. As it is, our country is so calm
and peaceful that we cannot imagine if we will ever have to worry for personal danger even in
future. It is not so secure in many countries. We uphold that it is an honour to recognize the dignity
of personal responsibility, and we consider as a privilege to be of service to others which our
culture has given the expression we call “mhosho” - to excel (mho, overhead; so, touch). Was
there any Naga citizen who over fallen into trouble and left to his and her own fate? This did not
happen in our memory. Wherever a need or trouble arise, is it not the responsibility of that
community to attend to it wherever it may be? Every citizen realizes his and her responsibility
toward fellow countrymen and countrywomen without fear. To do good to others, to stand by them
and be ready to live or die together if need be, is the highest culture any nation could wish to
have. You and I find it difficult to love our enemy; but to get an opportunity to help that enemy is a
rare privilege in trying “to excel” to do good to a fellow man. I call this a great civilization. These
are expressed, to be sure, not in the spirit of boasting our national culture but for certain necessity
because there are people who have a wry notion about us and we want them to come and see our
country with their own eyes.
In a truly democratic society police seams to be somewhat out of place as in a small country like
ours. Whatever may develop in future, our community must be sensibly alive all the time as in the
past. We must see to it that no section of people be dehumanized to the level of begging or
condemned below the social statues of other fellow citizens to be content with his or her helpless
lot. This is a responsibility our “community-groups” understand and we must be all the time on the
alert to stand by others.
There is no pauper in Nagaland. There is no social ‘out-cast’ in our country. There are no
professional beggars up to this very day. There is no families who are houseless anywhere
throughout Nagaland. There are no landless persons among us. We do not pay even land tax,
which is always a crushing burden to the mass citizens in many other countries. We have no
unemployment problem. Economically, Nagaland is on a strong foundation. And, no Naga wanted
the Indian immigrants to migrate in Nagaland. It will not help India in any way; not only that, it will
disturb the whole Nagaland.
In 1948 also we have informed the Indian Government that Nagaland cannot accept the Indian
excess population. Our country is too small. This is not an issue on a question of humanity. What
all of us know need not to be repeated. Even if we do give away our country to India, it will not do
any good. It will not solve Indian problem; it will not serve the world or create an atmosphere for
world peace in which every nation is deeply interested including our country.
Indian immigration to Nagaland by force will only create tension, a problem which did not exist in
the last thousand years of human history. We do not want any tension to arise between India and
Nagaland; and, we do not want India to create situation in Nagaland.
India is already too congested. While we look to the birth of a child to a family as a great blessing,
the birth of a child to the Indian family is a curse to their parents because they cannot feed them;
particularly, a girl is considered the greater curse, and very often these daughters are killed by
their own parents. It is a paradox that the only thing the Indians produce in excess is more Indians
whom they themselves do not want it, but they cannot stop producing them more and more. We
all know that India, as a country is a vast country, a very big country, in itself. It is almost three
times as big as the whole Great Britain, France and Germany combined together. But their race
have been multiplying so fast that their country cannot feed its population instead of producing
more than enough foods by such a vast family of man. When a river rises up the danger is not in
the riverbed but damage is done to the surrounding bank of the river; that is where we found
India wanted to dump her excess population in Nagaland as well as exploit the rich natural
resources in our territory. This is so dangerous that it threatens our very existence. Being a small
nation (almost a 1000th part of India), we can easily be submerged and get lost: our culture, our
civilization, our institutions, our nation and all that we had struggled and build up as we are today
will be perished without the least benefit to mankind. And, these we shall lost it not happily but in
anger and in perpetual sorrow. If such a day were to be forced on us, God forbid it would have
been better none of us were ever born into this world.
We have been threatened with violence.
And, we have weighed and considered everything carefully and all of you know our position. To
GIVE AWAY NAGALAND to please India IS NOT THE SOLUTION. You all know that our Naga
Delegation met His Excellency, the Governor-General of India, Shri C. Rajagopalachari at
Government House in Shillong, only 18 months ago, on November 28, 1949, and we stated to His
“Nagas shall not buy friendship with their territory.”
This is not an individual family matter: it concerns one whole nation - and a very small nation at
that - it needs great precaution. The crisis facing our nation concerns not only of this generation
but it concerns our posterity. As our fathers braved in their generations and handed us down a
heritage we are all proud of, we are here to reaffirm that we are the worthy children of our fathers
who sacrificed their lives for us of whom we are their posterity. We want our nation and our
posterity to continue to live in honour and in peace. Is it anti-Indian to state the living fact that we
want our nation to live?
We intensely value our way of living even in so far as land ownership is concerned; and, we yearn
nothing better leave alone our social institutions of pure democracy in a classless society where
each regard the other as brother and sister, parent and child. We are not just a bunch of human
beings called citizens.
The Indians openly say that Communism may take possession of Nagaland but there are
communists in India while there is no communist in Nagaland. China is the only Communist
country near us but we do not think China will ever bow so low to annex our territory. As for India,
we cannot yet say. We have no quarrel with Communism as an economic or political expression;
whatever it may be, we never worried about it. Nagas do not favour Communism as a way of life.
There is no political party in Nagaland. We do not need it. And we hope we shall not be pushed to
a position in which we have the least desire to shift our stand even so much for an expedient
measure. All things considered, Nagaland need not imitate or adopt foreign institution like India in
matters of political organizations.
The basic structure of political organization in Nagaland had withstood the change of time all
these centuries because it is based on the democratic principle of sovereignty of the people over
land ownership as private property. It needs no substitute.
Socially, our community is built up on a system of social alliance and this national institution,
which is really three in one whole (Thehu, Thehsü, Thino) has the greatest influence on each and
everyone of us.
Economically we have nothing to worry. There is no room for anyone of us to complain against
any sort of injustice since he has the same equal freedom with everybody else to own land and to
better his position. Nothing prevents him and her. What helps he needs the community is there to
stand by him for advice, protection or actual supply of material needs. Naturally enough the whole
conception is based on sympathy, love, pride (in the spirit of “mhosho”) and human conscience.
If Nagaland is not disturbed, our country will remain an oasis of peace in the present form of
purest democracy in this corner of the world. This is what we like to see it continued.
Someone may tell us that Nagas are Christians following a foreign religion. The Indians publicly
say this. We do not take Christianity as foreign religion any more than we consider the light of the
sun as foreign origin from outer world. There is a father-creator (Ukepenopfü) as we call it. He is
God. The message of the Gospel fulfills our Naga conception of religion – Nanyü – which literally
means “anguish of mind” for which we do worship. Once we came to know that there is a personal
Saviour to whom one can talk or pray directly, the real light dawned on us, and the weight of
man’s “anguish of mind” greatly vanish away. It is the end of the beginning of our personal
realization in relieving the anguish of mind in this world and for the next world after death.
Whatever the Indians may say of us, there is no foreignness in relationship between father and
child; that is, between God the Father and His children.
Our nation is emotionally fascinated with our way of Life. It makes life cheerful. We are not
unaware of other people’s opinion of us: they call us “primitive”. Yet, with all our primitiveness, you
see smiling face spontaneously beaming on you wherever you go. I say spontaneously because it
is not cultivated as an education. There is an instinctual feeling of self-confidence in you and you
know it. A sense of security is reflected in you behaviour. What is the source of this happy
outcome? It is in the foundation of our “community” system (Thino); and, secondly which is equally
important, it is in the land and your ability to cope with life.
We do not say that we have everything or do not need any other thing. That is sheer folly. But the
important thing is we have all the basic needs in political matters, for country’s administration,
community organization, economic set-up (uki-ulie); and these institutions we have in the way we
need it. These are not problems in Nagaland. It is not a grafted growth. Our fathers had laid down
all these in their time and we are just restating the fruit of their labour we enjoy today which are
natural enough to their ingenuity in the process of developments to our nationhood. And, the best
thing is, it fulfills the requirements of the present-day changes; no alteration or adjustment needed.
All sound principles stand throughout the ages. Time and situation cannot defy it. Need we stress
it again how truly we love our native institutions of people’s democracy where none is the master
or servant but all are as parents and children, brothers and sisters.
There is still another argument the Indian Authority put it forward which is of recent origin and it is
very dangerous FOR WHICH WE ARE HERS TODAY. They now say that the Nagas are not
united and that there is no substance or basis to defend the independence of Nagaland. This is a
strange argument. The Indians are trying to outwit us because they already got their Armed
Forces entrenched in our territory. This unhappy situation arose through the 10-Year Agreement
the Government of India entered into with the Naga National Council in 1947, which took place
here in Kohima on June 26, that is, 3 years, 10 months and 20 days today. But the Indian
Government officially repudiated the Agreement 1 year 6 months and 8 days ago (today) which
they made it known to our Naga Delegation on November 8, 1949 at the Government House in
Shillong. These facts are known to you. Seeing that they cannot deceive the Nagas, as they
thought they could browbeat us, have resorted to dirty, shameless and unmanly tactics. We are to
note carefully that present tactics of argument placed Nagaland not as a national state of a
people. India is trying now to argue the existence of Nagaland a political matter (of Indian
concern)! But how can this be? Whether we call a national state or a country, both concerns the
same thing: it concerns the territory of a people. Nagaland is the land of the Nagas; it is Naga
country and nobody else. We are not refugees or immigrants in this beautiful land. Our own
language tells exactly what a country is. We call country “Ura” which literally means ‘we are first’
(u, we; ra, ria, first). The root meaning of territory also developed from the same word; namely,
“theria” meaning ‘self first’. And our Naga language is certainly as old as human tradition and
history cannot contradict us. No man can argue with fact and existence of Nagaland (Nagara) is a
What confronts us just now is not a political matter as between a Colonial government and the
subject people. We are not Indian subjects. Only when there is controversy problem will arise. But,
in our case, NAGALAND is not a controversy.
The Indians went so far to tell us that “the talk of Naga Independence is the voice of only a few
educated educate Nagas”! The Indian Government have come to know that they cannot move the
mass Naga citizens in any other way except to say that it is the voice of the educated Nagas.
What of it? Where India will be without their educated class? Their talk is not only to confound us
but they are trying and preparing the way to confuse the world opinion in their favour. Here our
mass citizens who are directly concerned with land, as all our people are directly concerned with
land but particularly those of you who are cultivating your fields, you are far more acutely
conscious and much more feelingly touched of our national problems because it hurts you in a
very personal way. All of us realize that it is not merely a crisis; it is a question of life and death,
and for a small nation it means annihilation and extinction from the face of this earth. This is a
terrible aspect. With a united voice we shall explore every possible means to avoid getting
One thing we shall not make a mistake is that
NAGALAND IS NOT A PROBLEM. It is not a controversy between the Indians and the Nagas. It is
not a case. Strictly speaking, it is not an issue; at least, not yet.
The Nagas have nothing to do with India. And the Indians have nothing to do with Nagaland. This
is the exact position. Historically, Nagas and the Indians did not have a common tradition.
Racially, Nagas belong to the Mongolian family while the Indians belong to entirely a different race
of their own. Politically, neither the Nagas nor the Indians know each other, that is why trouble is
just about to start. Legally, it is nonexistent. There is absolutely no like. Culturally, the Nagas and
the Indians never had occasion to meet each other; and, there is nothing in common. Socially, the
Indians abhor the Nagas and the Nagas despise the Indians. It is better to face fact now.
Religiously, the Indians are Hindus; and the ancient Naga religion is “Animism” having nothing to
do with Hindus. As it is, there is nothing in common between the Nagas and the Indians. The
difference is too varied, the feeling is too deep, and the attitude is too wide and too malignant for
the two nations ever to think to live together in peace much less to become “Indian citizens”. The
only way to live in peace is to live apart. Economically, Nagaland had never been dependent on
India. All these have been so ever since and long before human history began. Nagas and Indians
do not speak the language. Why, we do not eat even the same food. It was very good that the
Indians never allow the Nagas to go near them because they hate our people.
So, what connection is there between the two people? Whoever tries to implicate us and confuse
the existing or rather non-existing state of affair, he tells deliberate lies. It is folly for India to
attempt to subjugate the Nagas. On our part, our fathers even in their illiterate stage never
implicated our nation with India; that is why we are so distinctly alive as individually a distinct
family of nation. This generation will not blunder. We shall not tarnish our honour.
Since our Naga people take word seriously as an oath, I stress these things once again so that
you all will bear in mind that our nation and those of us who are in the NAGA NATIONAL
COUNCIL for our national affairs have not made a mistake in dealing with India. Naga National
Council tried and continues trying to find a peaceful solution with India for Nagaland to continue to
live in peace without harassment. We have no secret. Nothing is hidden from you. And, whatever
may happen, you will that our nation had tried her best to avoid it, the rest, it is beyond our power.
NOW, WE ARE HERE TODAY to reaffirm the stand of our Naga nation that we do not need India
and we do not want her. We are here today to prove to INDIA and to the world that NAGALAND is
united and that our nation aspire the same conviction to continue to be independent as a distinct
nation as we are and have always been in the sovereign national state of the Nagas of Nagaland.
We have never doubted and we never worried about the question of our unity, which is an internal
affairs of Nagaland alone. This was never a problem and India has no business to interfere us. But
the menace of India is there because she wanted to grab our country saying one thing or another
like the well known story of the “Tiger and the Lamb” in the Aesop Fables who had painted the
worst type of cannibalistic humanity.
We are here united as one nation for the common cause of our nation’s freedom, which is in
jeopardy. Nagaland is independent state. We are as independent as any country could be; yet, we
are not free and we cannot be free because the Indian Government ceaselessly interferes our
administration with their Armed forces. They have been harassing our citizens all the time.
The presence of our people here in a big group in several thousands from all over our country
certainly relieves the awful sense of oppression and persecutions. We are already here about six
thousand people and more are still coming. Your presence here willingly to stand by our nation in
peril dispels the Indian argument of disunity among us.
We all know that the Indian government have strongly entrenched their Armed Forces right inside
our territory and they threaten our very existence to “use all the forces at my command to crush
you” as their Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru put it to our Naga Delegation who went to New
Delhi seeking a peaceful solution to live side by side as friendly neighbours.
We shall do all what is humanly possible so that we shall not have to go down in history in shame
or live in sorrow and disgrace; what else we cannot do, we leave it to God’s own mercy and to His
care and pray that we do not become a victim of the Indian imperialism.
WE ARE HERE TO COMMENCE OUR VOLUNTARY PLEBISCITE to put on record and to
express our mind, our national policy, in the form of Thumb Impression. It is five months now that
our nation has been given time to discuss about this Plebiscite Voluntarily offered by us to prove
our unity and our spontaneous willingness to continue to live on as a distinct nation. In the past
five months I have visited every region of our area and met everyone of you. What we do now will
go down in our history. We shall enough time especially this is being a busy season for our people
and many of you will have to be disturbed for this national work. Not a single village will be left out
as each and everyone of us will like to let our posterity know what we do now for their freedom, for
their glory, and for their happiness which they must continue to enjoy as free man.
THIS PLEBISCITE is not whether Nagaland should become a part of India or not. This is only to
show India and the world of Naga unity as one effective nation in order to let INDIA know the
position of NAGALAND. However, those who wish to show their differences in preference to join
the Indian union, we welcome their expression of full freedom of choice. Nobody need worry or
fear his and her safety in expressing oneself freely. All will be put on the record in the form of
fingerprint. We are making three separate copies for historical document and one copy shall be
presented to the Republic of India.
Lastly, let me state that the Nagas’ stand for independence, that is, the continued existence of
Nagaland as a sovereign state, is not a political challenge to India. We stand on, and try to
reaffirm, our own right as a nation. We Nagas are not against Indians. We never wanted enemies.
We only hope that India shall not become our enemy.
Let me enumerate my speech again:WHY DO THE NAGAS WANT TO BE INDEPENDENT?
1. We want to feel that we are absolutely and unconditionally free as a nation. Nagas belong to a
distinct people and live in a country entirely of their own. We want to remain outside the influence
of any other nation, be it white or brown.
2. We want to develop our own culture unhampered in the way we like, without having to worry for
a possible mixture of alien blood.
3. We want to direct our own education through the establishment of our own Universities.
4. We want to keep our own land in the possession of our own people for our own people.
5. We want to live our own lives. There should be no room for any possible interference, directly or
indirectly, whether now or in days to come.
6. We want to keep in our possession as a heritage something which is exclusively of Nagaland;
something which is bound to vanish and be lost to the Nagas if they were to live under an alien
direction; these are our national institutions of –
(a) Community Organisation.
(b) People’s sovereignty over ownership of property and land.
(c) Our culture: a culture of love with a true respect for individual personality, a society that admits
no strata of social class, caste or creed, religion or race.
7. We want peace, real peace put into an abiding practice in the lives of men. We do not want war.
And we do not want to see another war in our land. We do not want to make our country a
defence line. We do not want to let our children live in battlefields.
8. We want to make our country a place of happiness, of security and rest. We hope and we
cherish that we can make our country a meeting place of the East and an understanding center of
9. We believe that we shall become a better friend and that we can remain a better friend to India
and the outside world if we are left to ourselves – unmolested and unexploited.
10. We believe that it is not only for Nagaland but for India and other surrounding countries as well
that there is a better chance of creating and retaining peace and good will with a SOVEREIGN
NAGALAND being in existence.
Above everything else, we want to be free as a distinct nation: and we shall be free.
A.Z. Phizo, President,
NAGA NATIONAL COUNCIL,
16 May 1951.
THE AFSPA 1958: A REVIEW FROM NAGALAND AFTER 52YEARS
A long fifty two years have passed since the AFSPA was first introduced into Nagaland in April 1958. This
Act was first introduced into Naga soil in order to crush the Naga struggle to defend their declared
independence which was declared on August 14, 1958. The political and historical situation in which the
Act was introduced was therefore, a situation of war. This was clearly described by the then Director of the
Indian Intelligence Bureau B.N. Mullik in his book,”My years with Nehru.” Mullik wrote:
“Troops moved into Tuensang by Oct. 1955, and the war with the Nagas started from then.”
About the number of troops deployed at this stage of the war, he wrote:
“Ultimately, nearly two divisions of the army and thirty five battalions of the Assam Rifles or armed police
were in operation in the Naga Hills and Tuensang Frontier Divisions and in the adjoining areas.” (BN.
Mullik, My years with Nehru, pp308, 312)
About this number of troops deployed; two Divisions means 18000 troops and thirty five Battalions means
35000 troops which totals into 53000 troops. These troops were assisted by the Indian Air Force, heavy
artillery and light armored tanks.
Very soon, more then six hundred Naga villages were burned to ashes and hundreds upon thousands of
Nagas died from bullets, bombs, starvation and disease.
The Indian Government however, desperately tried to project the war as a law and order break down. But
was very much a war in which tiny Nagaland was desperately trying to defend its declared independence
while India tried its best to impose its declared independence on the Nagas. This was done through brutal
In this war, this draconian law was preceded by the equally heinous Assam Maintenance of Public order
Act of 1953 and the Disturbed Area Act of 1955.These acts would later on be followed by similar Acts like
the Nagaland Security Regulation Act of 1962 and the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act of 1967. But
however hard India had tried to stamp out Naga nationalism and Naga Independence from the face of the
earth, it has failed so far. This is because the national identity of a nation is indestructible and
The ASPA which gives the Indian soldiers sweeping powers like searching without search warrants,
arresting without arrest warrants, and even shooting to death on mere suspicion is a most illegal act
enacted in the annals of human legal history. In fact it is an Act that negates and even nullifies the very
concept and principles of law. This is because here is an act that says a person can be shot to death on
mere suspicion when the Law says “A person is innocent until proven guilty.” This extra judicial law is
sanctioned by Indian Law, protected by Indian Law and is even immune from legal prosecution- “except
with previous sanction of the Central Government.” This Act in short is an act that amounts to state
sponsored terrorism. And the sponsorer of this heinous law is the central Government of India through its
The grounds on which this Act can be promulgated is of course based on the Disturbed Area Act of 1955.
According to the procedure, when a State Government has declared an area to be disturbed, then the
AFSPA can come into operation. (This was amended in the 1972 AFSPA amendment and now the Centra
Government can bypass the concerned state and declare the Act from over the State’s head.)
Now, since all these heinous Acts and regulations were promulgated from the context of a war situation in
Nagaland in the 1950’s, let us go back to 1955 and ask the question, Who disturbed who in 1955? Did the
Naga National Council (NNC) or the Naga army go down to the plains of Assam and started burning
Assamese villages and killing Assamese villagers in 1955 to necessitate the promulgation of AFSPA? So
far as the verifiable records go, Nagas were simply defending their declared independence from within the
ancestral territories. They were simply fighting against the 53,000 Indian invasion forces that had come int
their land with the totally false claim that Nagas were Indians and Nagaland was Indian Territory. Prior to
this spirited defense of their rights, all historical, political and cultural facts showing that Nagas were not
Indians and would not join the Indian Union of 1947 had been furnished to both the departing British
government and the incoming Indian government before 1947. This was done in the form of submitting six
memorandums to the British Government and ten memorandums to India right from Jan. I, 1929 to 14
August 1947. (For details read the book, The Naga Saga.)
In all these peaceful endeavors, all that the Nagas had asked was that India and the rest of the world leave
the Nagas alone so that they could politically and economically develop themselves according to their own
genius. Who then was disturbing who in 1955 that that the Indian Government was compelled to
promulgate acts like Disturbed Area Act and AFSPA to check law and order breakdown with tanks aero
planes and artillery???
In the subsequent years, when the Naga nation took up arms to protect their houses from being burnt and
their sisters from being raped and their people from being butchered, another act called the Unlawful
Activities Prevention Act of 1967 was again slammed on the Nagas. Now, Nagas would like to ask the
Indian government this second question: Is self defense activities against invasion, domination and
persecution- unlawful activities in your legal understanding? If these activities are unlawful activities
according to you, then your whole struggle against British imperialism and colonization from 1857 to 1947
were also unlawful activities.
Now in review and conclusion, allow me to state the following:
1. In 52 long years of implementing and exercising this heinous AFSPA, all that the Indian Government ha
achieved is alienating not only the Nagas but all the peoples of the whole North east region of India. This
work of alienation is now being extended to the people of Jammu and Kashmir where it is also in operation
2. A second achievement of the AFSPA is that it has insulted Mahatma Gandhi and all the good people of
India. Consequently, in the annals of human history, it will be recorded that the Indian government used th
most unlawful law to persecute and kill people for over half a century. With its renewal on Oct. 20, 2010, it
remains to be seen how much further the GOI wishes to extend this black record to smear India’s
democratic face before the world for all times to come.
As for the Nagas and Meiteis as well as other North Eastern peoples who have all suffered under this
inhuman law, it will also be recorded in the annals of history that they had done all that they could do to
oppose this law. Their record will be written in the following manner:
1. They first took up arms to defend themselves against this life nullifying act. For more then a century, the
fought against it in their villages and also in their jungles and were hunted like animals all their lives. They
even marched across international boundaries into Pakistan and China to carry on the fight. Yes, their men
folk did what a man and a father was supposed to do to defend their national honor as well as their family’
2. As for their womenfolk, they even stripped naked before the Indian soldiers to protest against this
heinous law because under its protective umbrella thousands of women had been raped. One of their
women even resorted to hunger strike and went for a fast on to death for ten years. But even these
desperate actions were all ignored by the government of India.
In the end, the people who have suffered under this cruel law are only left wondering as to whether the
Indian government is trying to force them to become human suicide bombers. On their part, they do not
want to resort to this kind of protest because if a people are reduced to a state of hatred, then hatred
destroys both “The hater” as well as “The hated.”
A BRIEF PAPER PRESENTATION IN A SEMINAR ON “ARMED
FORCES (SPECIAL POWERS) ACT”
A Brief Paper presentation in a Seminar on “
“Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act” during the Festival of Hope, Justice and Peace
held at Imphal from November 2 – 6, 2010,
By: Neingulo Krome, former Secretary General, NPMHR on;
Civil Rights Movement
(Misguided or Deliberate Policy: Armed Rebellion and Political Conflict)
Mr. Chair, fellow panellists, distinguished participants of the Seminar on Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, Ladies and Gent
At the outset I want to thank the Just Peace Founda
Foundation for giving us this opportunity of deliberating issues of common
in a most befitting and elaborate manner, commemorating it with the completion of 10 years of Irom Sharmila’s Fast
unto Death against one of the most draconian and anti-democratic law in India. In this aspect, I also want to salute Ms Irom
Sharmila for her courage and ability to demonstrate the highest humanly possible sacrifice for the cause of not only the “ten
slaughtered civilians at Malom Village” by personnel of the Indian Security Forces, but for humanity as a whole. Am sure, when
she decided to protest to demand the removal of the AFSPA, she did not do it for fame or glory but just took out the best of the
“humanity in her” for the sake of millions of defenceless civilians and even for those people who are devoid of humanity and
perpetrates inhuman acts against fellow human beings.
Having said that, going by the analysis of various international monitoring agencies, including those of the United Nations, it is clear
that the Government of India made an “over-zealous effort to integrate the people of the North East into their so
mainstream by using the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act”. Therefore, this is a deliberate policy of the Government of India
against the people of North East starting with the Naga Movement as one of the first group of people who asserted their ident
identities as –
Nagas and “not Indians” and launched a political movement which turned into an armed resistance movement under mil
compulsion. This Act was then enacted as The Armed Forces (Assam and Manipur) Special Powers Act of 1958 as the present State
of Nagaland was just a district under Assam at that time and Manipur with the present Naga Hills districts a Union Territory After
Manipur became a full-fledged state in 1972 along with Meghalaya and Tripura, this Act was again amended in 1972 in order to
extend this Act to the newly created states. Whatever the nomenclature or target group may have been at that point of time, the
people of North East India as a whole, Punjab, Jammu & Kashmir and many parts of the Indian sub continent now reels under the
shadow of this “death penalty” – “Shot to kill” anyone on mere suspicion. This is what the Government of India is apparently seeking
to address through the AFSPA.
Its efficacies can be summarised on the fact that, rather than integrating the people of North East or wherever political con
conflict exist, it
has only alienated the people and increased social and political unrest with the multiplication of armed resistance groups. And in so
far as the personnel of the Indian Security forces are concerned; they have effectively executed various categories of protec
“national security” in exercise of powers conferred under the AFSPA, such as; (and I quote from the report of the People’s Union
for Democratic Rights, Delhi after the Supreme Court’s Judgement on the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act in 1997 was
pronounced under the caption “An Illusion of Justice” published in 1998)
a. Extra-judicial killings
b. Extra-Judicial deprivation of the liberty of people, specially in villages including;
(ii) Illegal imposition of curfew
(iii) Long periods of detention at army posts and camps
(iv) Use of churches and schools as detention or interrogation centres
(v) Setting up of illegal interrogation centres
(vi) Rape, molestation and sexual harassment of women
(vii) Forced labour
(viii) Looting of homes
(ix) Desecration of places of worship, specially churches
Torture which is mainly carried out with a view to extract confessions which is a serious crime under section 330 and 331
of the Indian Penal Code. The torture includes, beating with rifle butts, kicking with boots and hitting with blunt weapons, giving
electric shocks, breaking limbs, depriving person of food drinks and sleep, hanging a person upside down and beating on soles,
burying a person alive, stripping, blindfolding and hooding, stuffing chilli powder into eyes, nose and private parts, tying of hands and
feet and suspending a person over fire with a bamboo in between the hands and legs, threats to shot, interrogation at gun
However, these reports do not include killings through fake-encounters, which almost became a daily practice in Imphal valley in the
recent times, so also in Jammu and Kashmir and parts of North east India, including the many parts of the “so-called” mainland India
wherever social, economic and political conflict persists. There are also so many practices of harassments like checking and frisking,
interrogations on the streets, etc. which need not be discussed in details.
Nevertheless, based on the foundation of such experiences, even before the AFSPA was enacted in 1958, for the Nagas, the Assam
Maintenance of Public Order of 1953 was enough to raze our entire villages to ashes. And even after AFSPA was enforced,
another Act called the Nagaland Security Regulation of 1962 was passed. These were subsequently followed by the Unlawful
Activities Prevention Act, in 1972, Maintenance of Internal security Act (MISA) under Indira Gandhi’s Emergency in 1975 and
so on. Needless to describe, but the sufferings of the people were just too much to bear even for people who were mere witnesses.
Under such circumstances it is only natural that Civil Rights Movements are launched. Naga Peoples Movement for Human Rights
(NPMHR) is one such Civil Rights Movement in Nagaland which was formed in 1978 to respond to the need of the time. Similarly, in
the context of the North East as a whole, we also had the North East Coordination Committee on Human Rights (NECOHR).
When Oinam incident took place in 1987, Civil Rights groups of Manipur came together and formed the Coordination Committee on
Oinam Issue (COCOI).
Likewise in the backdrop of heightened violence in Imphal valley in the 70s and 80s, various likeminded people from different
background came together to take up human rights issues under the banner of Civil Liberties and Human Rights Organisations
(CLAHRO). There was also another umbrella organisation called the Coordination Committee on Human Rights
(COHR) consisting of various communities of Manipur, like Kukis, Meiteis and Nagas etc. and jointly defended the civil population of
Manipur from the excessiveness of the Security forces. And of course now we have the Human Rights Alert (HRA) and others which
I may not be well aware of. But if we are to move “towards a life with dignity” to confront those mechanism which strips us of our
dignity and our very life itself, civil rights movements must be strengthened at all cost, although we must acknowledge, whether for
good or for bad, armed resistances have played its own share of restoring dignity. Because in the absence of any strong Civil Rights
Movement no Government will listen to the pleadings of “suffering souls” as long as they can comfortably remain in their respective
powers. Therefore, the main challenge before us today is to question ourselves, how we can build a strong Civil Rights Movement.
Even now we do have many such movements which are all strong in their own ways, but are fragmented in terms of team
team-work. If our
visions are common and if we can live and work on those ethics together, at least on common issues, I see no reasons why we
cannot have good team-work.
Let me end this presentation with an analysis as a footnote which say; “The Armed Forces Special Powers Act contravenes both
Indian and International law standards. This was exemplified when India presented its second periodic report to the United
Nations Human Rights Committee in 1991. Members of the UNHRC asked numerous questions about the validity of the
AFSPA, questioning how the AFSPA could be deemed constitutional under Indian law and how it could be justified in light
of Article 4 of the ICCPR. The Attorney General of India relied on the sole argument that the AFSPA is a necessary measure
to prevent the secession of the North Eastern states. He said that a response to this agitation for secession in the North
East had to be done on a "war footing." He argued that the Indian Constitution, in Article 355, made it the duty of the Centr
Government to protect the states from internal disturbance and that there is no duty under international law to allow
“We who believe in freedom cannot rest” – Ella Baker (An African-American civil rights leaders).
‘A SITUATION HAS BEEN CREATED IN THE NORTHEAST TO SIDETRACK NEGOTIATIONS’
The NSCN’s self-styled home minister Rh. Raising says the outfit is willing to walk the extra mile. But
By Nitin A. Gokhale
says they will soon
decide on the next
round of talks
Commitment to a
The NSCN is angry. And restless. Eight years after agreeing to a ceasefire with
the Central government, the dominant separatist outfit is fast running out of
unwavering so far.
patience. Led by Issak Chisi Swu and Thuingaleng Muivah and hence known as
the I-M faction of the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN-IM), the
outfit has sent a clear signal last fortnight that it is not happy with the progress
compel us, we
of the talks so far when it agreed to extend the ceasefire only for six months
may go back to
instead of the usual one year.
the jungle, not to
fight but to defend
“The ball is in the government of India’s court. We have cooperated fully and
demonstrated our total commitment, but in the past eight years no tangible
progress has been made,” the outfit’s self-styled Home Minister Rh. Raising told
Tehelka in an exclusive interview.
So was extending the truce only for six months a way to pressurise the Indian government? Raising,
among the top four of the NSCN(IM)’s self-styled Government of People’s Republic of Nagalim
(GPRN), does not give a direct answer but acknowledges that a “situation has been created in the
Northeast of late to sidetrack negotiations” with his outfit.
Raising, however, hastens to add that the NSCN(IM)’s commitment to a
negotiated peace settlement is unwavering so far. He also sounds a note of
warning: “If circumstances compel us, we may go back to the jungle, not to fight
but to defend ourselves since many forces hostile to us are being backed and
propped up by the Indian intelligence agencies.” Raising goes on to reveal,
“Before end of August we are planning to have a consultative meeting to decide
the next date of talks with the Indian government. In that meeting will take a
decision whether and how to continue the negotiations.”
Voices in the
students at a
Dharmender Ruhil “Look how the democratic agitation launched by our people against the Manipur
government is being suppressed by force. If this continues, we will be forced to
review the negotiations process,” Raising says, referring to the 52-day economic blockade of the vital
National Highway 39 imposed by the All Naga Students Association, Manipur (ANSAM). The
blockade (see main story) was initiated by the Naga students to protest against the declaration of
June 18 as a public holiday to commemorate the ‘uprising” by protesting Meiteis in 2001. “We Nagas
perceives this as a challenge to our movement for integration of all Naga-inhabited areas of the
Northeast,” Raising says.
Aug 27 , 2005
• Manipur: Between the valley and the hills
Nagas have felt discriminated against for long but they have been emboldened to voice their
bitterness openly after the Centre-NSCN (IM) talks. Now, the common man is giving vent to the
Nagalim idea, and the Manipuri is apprehensive. Nitin A. Gokhale reports
• Along Manipur’s broken lifeline
Nitin A. Gokhale travels down the National Highway 39 from Guwahati to Imphal to find that
distances have grown and an uneasy calm envelops the region again
• ‘A situation has been created in the Northeast to sidetrack negotiations’
The NSCN’s self-styled home minister Rh. Raising says the outfit is willing to walk the extra mile.
But no more, reports Nitin A. Gokhale
INDIA LISTENED TO US ONLY WHEN WE TOOK UP ARMS’
The Naga rebellion has spawned many groups in the past 60 years. NSCN-IM’s Maj Gen Phunthing Shimray tellsAVALOK
LANGER that his outfit wants to bring all Nagas under one administrative umbrella
Nestled in the dense jungles of the Naga Hills, the Naga people’s movement simmers, ignored and unresolved. Since 1946,
the Naga National Council (NNC) had championed the cause, but today, a new generation of separatists hold the reins of
Dissatisfied and unwilling to accept the controversial Shillong Accord, by which members of the NNC came overground and
surrendered, Isak Chisi Swu, Thuingaleng Muivah and SS Khaplang broke away from the group and formed the National
Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN) in 1980. With external support, the NSCN pushed towards self-reliance and
sustainability. As it grew into a modern, organised and lethal movement, it lent support to other rebel outfits.
In 1988, the NSCN split into NSCN-IM (Isak Chisi Swu and Th. Muivah) and NSCN-K (SS Khaplang). Today, 10 years into the
ceasefire, Nagaland’s demand for freedom remains intact. Excerpts from an interview with Maj Gen Phunthing Shimray, one of
the new generation leaders, in Mokokchung:
What is keeping the Naga movement going?
When I go to India, they tell me, ‘You are a part of India, you should be happy
that you have everything.’ But I want to be free, I want my right to choose.
India’s claim to Nagaland is a legal one, because Nagaland was handed over
to them by the British. But nations aren’t just born, they are created by people
coming together. It is not about having a legal right, it is about the aspirations
of the people and their right to choose. We never chose India. If the
aspirations of a people are not met, there will always be conflict. For 200
years, the British ignored the aspirations of India and this gave rise to the
Indian freedom struggle. Today, India is ignoring the aspirations of the Nagas
and we are fighting for our right to self-determination.
Free spirit Money and
development won’t solve our
problems, says Shimray
PHOTO: AVALOK LANGER
The NSCN has been described as ‘the mother of insurgencies’ in the Northeast. Did it offer support to other
If you are beaten up every now and then, won’t you raise your voice? Won’t you seek legal recourse? If the law fails you, then
what, won’t you take it up yourself? It is not a question of helping them; it is about struggling people aspiring for their rights.
India talks about 8 percent growth, but who is growing, my friend? Not the common man. India’s democracy is only benefiting
the privileged few. Earlier, the Northeast was considered untouchable, it was ignored, a taboo of sorts. No one looked at us or
heard our problems when we used the democratic process. But now that we have taken up arms, the Indians listen. We may
have helped some of the organisations, but all of them have their own source: the people.
Rumour has it that the NSCN-IM actively helped the Naxal movement. Is there any truth in this?
Yes, we helped them, but not since the commencement of the ceasefire (10 years ago). For us, it is not about left, right,
capitalist or communist. It is about the people, about their rights and aspirations.
What is your reply to those who believe that development will end the Naga insurgency?
It has been 60 years, if it had to, it would have died out by now. The Indian government pumps in crores every year but
nationalism can’t be bought, it comes from the heart. Even if Dimapur and Kohima become like Kolkata, the movement will not
die. Yes, there may be some who are taken in by development, but the numbers are with the movement. It is not about money,
it is not about development. It is about our rights, our freedom and the uniqueness of the Naga people who can’t be bought.
The NSCN-IM leaders visited Delhi in March and submitted a list of 30 confidential demands. Some media reports said
they had given up the demand for sovereignty and only want greater autonomy...
What does greater autonomy mean to you? To me, it means sovereignty. We cannot compromise on that, it is the right of the
people, the will of the Nagas. In a democratic set-up, the will of the people is supreme. We also asked for separate passports.
If I have a separate identity from you, wouldn’t I want my own passport? Nagalim (Greater Nagaland) has always been our
goal, we have always wanted to bring all Nagas under one administrative umbrella. There is nothing new about that.
A view of Mokokchung
PHOTO: ESTHER KEMP
Like Jammu and Kashmir was given its own constitution, flag and special provisions, would you be willing to go
down that path?
That is not an option. We don’t want a Naga version of Article 370. It has done nothing for the Kashmiris. It gave them all the
power to run their state, but at the same time India took it all back. So, what’s the use? You need a home, a place you call
your own, a place you can go back to. Once you have that, you can travel the world. Without that, you are a man without a
country. For example, where do you originally come from? (I try to explain my confusing mixture of pre-Partition North West
Frontier and Kashmiri lineage. He smiled and continued...)See, you didn’t fight for your homeland and now you have lost it.
You are a man without a nation and that is a future we won’t settle for.
How do you react when people say that the Naga people’s movement is an insurgency? Does that bother you?
Bhagat Singh was called a terrorist once. People said he was just an angry man acting out of frustration, but he was not afraid
to die for his beliefs. He was a one-man army battling the British, but he fought for his cause, his people. The British labelled
him a terrorist, an underground element, but today, he is revered as a freedom fighter, a national hero.
When I was young, I saw my people struggling. That is why I wanted to help my people. I am pushed to lead my people by my
conviction. I am who I am and you are who you are, but we must learn to accept each other for our differences. Then we can
move forward, that is what I want.
‘WE’RE NOT PART OF INDIA, SO WE CAN’T BE CALLED SECESSIONISTS’
BY Suneha Dutta
The General Secretary of the Naga People’s Movement for Human Rights, Dr.
N Venuh, is an advocate of independent Nagaland. In his recent speech
during the convention on Kashmir in New Delhi, he espoused the cause of
Azad Kashmir, drawing parallels between the two states. Excerpts from an
interview in which he spoke about the demand for freedom, the insurgency
and the futility of holding a plebiscite in Nagaland:
Dr. N Venuh, Gneral Secretary,
Syed Ali Shah Geelani has been called a secessionist. Won’t Nagaland’s demand be also dubbed the same?
We are not part of India, so we cannot be called secessionists. The government has to give us our rights. We can be friends
with the Indian State, but cannot be part of the Indian Union.
In 1975, the Shillong Accord was signed between the Naga National Council and the Indian government, where the
former accepted “the Indian constitution without any condition”. Then how can you say that you never agreed to be
part of India?
Since 1947 till today, no one in Nagaland has accepted the Indian Constitution. Just because one group agreed doesn’t mean
everyone did. That is why the movement is still going on.
Is there a similarity between the demands of the Nagas and Kashmiris?
Yes. History tells us that Kashmir is a disputed territory. This is why the UN office is still there in Srinagar. The Kashmiris
should have the right to self-determination. They should be allowed to decide whether they want to be with India or go their
own way. This is true for Nagas. We never wanted to be a part of India.
Nagaland has different ethnic tribes who want their own space to express their identity. Is that an obstacle to
reaching a solution?
There are differences, but the goal is the same. In every movement, there are various political groups but they are united by a
single political aim. There is no disagreement on that.
Kashmiri Pundits argue that their interests will be suppressed. Similarly in Nagaland, if one political group gains
power, won’t there be a similar subordination of the others?
In Nagaland, everyone is the same. The situation is not similar to that of Kashmir. Once Nagaland gets freedom, everyone is
going to accept it. There is no conflict on that.
But how can you be so sure of the people’s mandate?
Well, we had a plebiscite in 1951. At that time, everyone wanted to be free from India and become a separate nation.
But that happened a long time back. Won’t the new generation have something different to say?
I don’t think anyone would have anything different to say. The 1951 plebiscite reflected the wishes of the people across
Nagaland. The issues haven’t changed, the oppression has only increased. Why would they change their mind? No, I don’t
think another plebiscite is required.
What if the Indian government agrees to self-determination for the Nagas on the basis of a plebiscite or a public
Another plebiscite isn’t necessary. The Indian government will use it as an excuse to postpone decision-making on the issue.
The Greater Nagaland movement wants to encompass all Nagas, including those living in neighboring states. Isn’t
that an imperialistic/expansionist attitude?
When we are talking about our sovereign rights, we are talking about a land of people. There are Nagas in Manipur, Arunachal
and Assam. We want to include them because the Nagas were artificially divided. We are not going to grab anyone’s land. We
just want to bring the people under one administration. When India was under British rule, it was divided into different parts
without the will of people. They didn’t like that. Similarly, we want to maintain good relations with our neighbors but also want
to make sure the Nagas are brought together.
There are many who are frustrated with the violence in the name of Greater Nagaland and want nothing more than
peace. Why are they being made to live in a state of perpetual tension?
We are not a violent group. We try talking to the people, take the initiative to talk to Manipuris, Assamese or the Arunachalis to
have more understanding. But if they go against us and engage in violence, we have no option but to react.
What about the numerous Naga insurgent groups fighting their own battles? Do you believe that they will hold their
peace once Nagaland becomes independent?
The insurgent groups are a result of years of ill-treatment and repression at the hands of the Indian government and the
military presence in the state. Once the repression and the army are no longer there, the groups will mend their ways.
But how can one be sure? Kashmiri youth have given up arms and taken up stones, while Nagas continue to fight
There might be violence, but they will abate once the repression ends. Do you know how many people the army have killed?
How many women they have raped in Nagaland? Till such atrocities happen, the people will be driven to exercise violence.
But even then none of the groups have ever harmed a civilian.
Many allege that the NPMHR is just a frontal organisation of the National Socialist Council of Nagaland-IM and that it
espouses every issue that the political party fights for. Is that true?
That is totally wrong. We are a human rights group working for the Nagas. As the NSCM-IM is working with the government for
peace in Nagaland, we help them to further the cause.
You have pledged support for the Kashmiri cause. Is that support going to result in any concrete efforts to help
We support our Kashmir brethren’s cause completely. In fact, we support anyone fighting for their identity and freedom. But
no, we are not planning to take any further action in this direction in terms of efforts. But our moral support will be with them
because we understand their struggle.
Article 371 a Special provision with respect to the State of Nagaland
(1) Not withstanding anything in this Constitution –
(a) No Act of Parliament in respect of(i)
Religious or social practices of the Nagas,
Naga customary law and procedure,
Administration of civil and criminal justice involving decisions according to Naga customary law,
Ownership and transfer of land and its resources, shall apply to the State of Nagaland unless the Legislative
Assembly of Nagaland by a resolution so decides;
(b) The Governor of Nagaland shall have special responsibility with respect to law and order in the State of Nagaland for so
long as in his opinion internal disturbances occurring in the Naga Hills-Tuensang Area immediately before the formation of that
State continue therein or in any part thereof and in the discharge of his functions in relation thereto the Governor shall, after
consulting the Council of Ministers, exercise his individual judgment as to the action to be taken:
Provided that if any question arises whether any matter is or is not a matter as respects which the Governor is under this subclause required to act in the exercise of his individual judgment, the decision of the Governor in his discretion shall be final,
and the validity of anything done by the Governor shall not be called in question on the ground that he ought or ought not to
have acted in the exercise of his individual judgment:
Provided further that if the President on receipt of a report from the Governor or otherwise is satisfied that it is no longer
necessary for the Governor to have special responsibility with respect to law and order in the State of Nagaland, he may by
order direct that the Governor shall cease to have such responsibility with effect from such date as may be specified in the
(c) In making his recommendation with respect to any demand for a grant, the Governor of Nagaland shall ensure that any
money provided by the Government of India out of the Consolidated Fund of India for any specific service or purpose is
included in the demand for a grant relating to that service or purpose and not in any other demand;
(d) As from such date as the Governor of Nagaland may by public notification in this behalf specify, there shall be established
a regional council for the Tuensang district consisting of thirty-five members and the Governor shall in his discretion make
rules providing for(i)
the composition of the regional council and the manner in which the members of the regional council shall be
chosen: Provided that the Deputy Commissioner of the Tuensang district shall be the Chairman ex officio of the regional
council and the Vice-Chairman of the regional council shall be elected by the members thereof from amongst themselves;
the qualifications for being chosen as, and for being, members of the regional council;
the term of office of, and the salaries and allowances, if any, to be paid to members of, the regional council;
the procedure and conduct of business of the regional council;
the appointment of officers and staff of the regional council and their conditions of services; and
any other matter in respect of which it is necessary to make rules for the constitution and proper functioing of the
(2) Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, for a period of ten years from the date of the formation of the State of
Nagaland or for such further period as the Governor may, on the recommendation of the regional council, by public notification
specify in this behalf,-
(a) The administration of the Tuensang district shall be carried on by the Governor;
(b) Where any money is provided by the Government of India to the Government of Nagaland to meet the requirements of the
State of Nagaland as a whole, the Governor shall in his discretion arrange for an equitable allocation of that money between
the Tuensang district and the rest of the State;
(c) No Act of the Legislature of Nagaland shall apply to Tuensang district unless the Governor, on the recommendation of the
regional council, by public notification so directs and the Governor in giving such direction with respect to any such Act may
direct that the Act shall in its application to the Tuensang district or any part thereof have effect subject to such exceptions or
modifications as the Governor may specify on the recommendation of the regional council:
Provided that any direction given under this sub-clause may be given so as to have retrospective effect;
(d) The Governor may make regulations for the peace, progress and good government of the Tuensang district and any
regulations so made may repeal or amend with retrospective effect, if necessary, any Act of Parliament or any other law which
is for the time being applicable to that district;
one of the members representing the Tuensang district in the Legislative Assembly of Nagaland shall be
appointed Minister for Tuensang affairs by the Governor on the advice of the Chief Minister and the Chief Minister in tendering
his advice shall act on the recommendation of the majority of the members as aforesaid_365;
the Minister for Tuensang affairs shall deal with, and have direct access to the Governor on, all matters relating to
the Tuensang district but he shall keep the Chief Minister informed about the same;
(f) Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this clause, the final decision on all matters relating to the Tuensang
district shall be made by the Governor in his discretion;
(g) In articles 54 and 55 and clause (4) of article 80, references to the elected members of the Legislative Assembly of a State
or to each such member shall include references to the members or member of the Legislative Assembly of Nagaland elected
by the regional council established under this article;
(h) In article 170(i)
Clause (1) shall, in relation to the Legislative Assembly of Nagaland, have effect as if for the word "sixty", the
word "forty-six" had been substituted;
in the said clause, the reference to direct election from territorial constituencies in the State shall include election
by the members of the regional council established under this article;
(iii) in clauses (2) and (3), references to territorial constituencies shall mean references to territorial constituencies
in the Kohima and Mokokchung districts.
(3) If any difficulty arises in giving effect to any of the foregoing provisions of this article, the President may by order do
anything (including any adaptation or modification of any other article) which appears to him to be necessary for the purpose of
removing that difficulty:
Provided that no such order shall be made after the expiration of three years from the date of the formation of the State of
Nagaland. Explanation. - In this article, the Kohima, Mokokchung and Tuensang districts shall have the same meanings as in
the State of Nagaland Act, 1962.