Nappp medication paper
Published on: Mar 3, 2016
Transcripts - Nappp medication paper
National Alliance of Professional Psychology Providers
F a il u r e
S erv e
A White Paper on The Use of Medications As A First line Treatment
And Misuse In Behavioral Interventions
This report was prepared by:
The National Alliance of Professional Psychology Providers
A Statement Of Concern From: The National Alliance of Professional Psychology Providers
There is a crisis in our nation's behavioral health care system. Many factors contribute to this crisis including
financial, regulatory, and cultural issues. One of the most glaring problems in this crisis is the corporate practice
of the healthcare industry of placing earnings and exorbitant profits above the public interest at the expense of
quality services to those in need. Another significant factor contributing to the poor quality of services provided
to patients suffering from behavioral disorders, when they are available, can be explained by a significant shift
of behavioral healthcare from specialists, such as psychologists and psychiatrists, to primary care physicians.
While well meaning, the majority of primary care physicians are not trained or experienced enough to provide
behavioral health treatment and diagnosis. These physicians have become naive distributors for drug
manufactures and collude with insurers in the face of solid research that shows that psychotropic medications
are not effective or beneficial for an ever growing number of patients. NAPPP accepts that not all primary care
physicians are puppets of the drug companies or insurance industry. Most are caring and hardworking
professionals. However, as a profession, primary care physicians know, or should know, that psychotropic
medications are mostly ineffective and potentially dangerous to patients. As such, most physicians who
prescribe psychotropic medication do so to the detriment of their patients.
The enclosed report, "A Failure to Serve," addresses this crisis, by providing a perspective of the problems
encountered by patients who need behavioral healthcare but are not receiving it. The authors provide solid
solutions based on sound, up-to-date research to support our assertions and conclusions about this crisis in
behavioral healthcare. The present system, where behavioral health is provided in primary care settings will
become even more prominent as the new healthcare mandates become implemented. NAPPP is concerned that
healthcare reform will retain and exacerbate the violation of patient care that is ubiquitous and characteristic of
the present system.
We believe that the concerns and problems addressed in this report need to be taken seriously as a public policy
issue and one that should be a matter of public interest that consumers of behavioral healthcare be protected and
provided with positive and cost effective treatments. Should the current practices of behavioral health treatment
be continued by primary care physicians, NAPPP strongly believes that patients in desperate need of these
services will suffer as drug companies, healthcare insurers, and physicians, all gain at the patient's and the
Among the problems well-documented and detailed in the report are:
1. Medication as a first line treatment for behavioral conditions is unsupported by
the most recent outcome research.
2. Providing behavioral healthcare in a primary care setting without an appropriate evaluation by a
doctoral level psychologist is ineffective, non-beneficial, costly, and denies patients the standard of
care required to treat behavioral disorders.
3. The growing incidence of adverse drug events can be directly associated with the lack of skills
and training provided to physicians in medical school and practice. On-the-job training to prescribe
medications must be preceded by solid educational preparation. Even the best medical schools
provide only 90 hours of pharmacological education over a four year medical school curriculum.
The vast majority of medical schools provide far less training.
4. There is a long term shortage of psychiatrists that will not be resolved. Because of this shortage,
primary care physicians have become the dominant prescribers of psychotropic medications. Drug
companies seizing on physicians lack of training, have deceived them and the public about the
safety, effectiveness, and benefit of psychotropic medications. Consequently, patients have been put
at risk and become literal guinea pigs for questionable medications such as antidepressants,
antipsychotics, and other drugs marketed to treat behavioral disorders.
5. Children and the aged populations are at the most risk as they are receiving treatment from the least
prepared physicians and are the targets of drug companies who see children and the aged as "profit
centers" in the ever increasing quest for market share. Off label use of medications to these populations
are promoted by drug companies simply to expand the profit of their existing products.
6. Taxpayers are also victims of the healthcare industry. Healthcare reform will now require an additional
30+ million people, to obtain healthcare insurance. For those unable to afford insurance, their costs will
be subsidized. NAPPP supports healthcare reform and universal coverage. We advocate and agree to
extending care to everyone who needs it. What we are most concerned about, however, is having
taxpayers subsidize drug companies, insurers and providers whose products and services are not proven
to work as advertised. Costs for medications will continue to increase to a projected $400 billion dollars
by the time the new reform is implemented. We have a right and responsibility to require physicians to
work in the public interest and not as mere distributors for drug companies and in collusion with
insurers who gladly reimburse for ineffective medications because they are cheaper than providing
7. Unlimited licensure of physicians contributes to a system where patients are not being appropriately
served and subjected to undue harm. Limited licensure can improve competence and treatment outcomes.
It also can greatly decrease the cost of healthcare while raising the standard of care provided to patients.
Patients suffering from behavioral disorders are amongst our most vulnerable citizens. We should not allow
any profession or entity to hide behind selective science and the professional domination of healthcare to
subject patients and the public to patently ineffective and non-beneficial treatments. We do not argue that the
healthcare industry and providers should be denied making a profit. Profit, however, must be balanced with the
public good and must be honestly and ethically earned, based on real need, and based on sound theories and
outcome research. Failure to hold physicians, providers, drug manufacturers and insurers to these minimal
standards will produce even greater crises in healthcare aside from the misery afflicted on a trusting population
who is at the mercy of a system concerned more with profit than results.
NAPPP believes that we can all do better and we should strive to so.
For the purpose of this document, behavioral disorders are defined as any mental, emotional, or behavior
disorder included in the International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-9-
CM) or the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM IV) diagnostic manuals.
John L. Caccavale, Ph.D., ABMP
Executive Director, NAPPP
Table of Contents
Th complete report available at http://nappp.org/White_paper.pdf
NAPPP Statement of Concern.................................................................................. 2
Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 5
Executive Summary.......................................................................................................... 6
NAPPP Policy Statement.................................................................................................. 14
I. The Evidence Against Primary Care Physicians Providing
Behavioral Healthcare .................................................................................................. 16
II. Reducing Adverse Drug Events
From Physician Error..................................................................................................... 21
III. Psychiatry In Crisis: Impacts
on Primary Care, Patient Safety
and Public Healthcare Policy........................................................................................ 25
IV. Antidepressant Medications Are Ineffective
And Claims Are Misleading.......................................................................................... 30
V. Physicians Often Do Not Provide Patients
With Important Information When Prescribing Medications......................................... 34
VI. Reducing Harm and Healthcare Costs: A Review
Of A Physician's Unlimited License To Practice........................................................ 36
VII. Medicating America's Children.................................................................................... 41
VIII. Patients Deserve To Be Evaluated And Treated
By Real Doctors.......................................................................................................... 46
IX. The Treatment Of The Elderly In
Long Term Care............................................................................................................ 50
X. Recommendations........................................................................................................... 57
XI. References....................................................................................................................... 63
NAPPP would like to acknowledge the contributions of the following individuals who have contributed to this
The NAPPP Executive Committee
John Caccavale, Ph.D. ABMP
Nicholas Cummings, Ph.D., Sc.D
Jerry Morris, Psy.D., ABPP, ABMP
Dave Reinhardt, Ph.D., ABMP
Howard, Rubin, Ph.D., ABMP
Jack Wiggins, Ph.D., ABPP
We extend our gratitude to the following NAPPP members. Dr. Joseph Casciani contributed his work on the
treatment of the elderly in long term care. Dr. Jerry Morris contributed to the sections on antidepressants.
Dr. John Reeves contributed many valuable references to this report. To Drs. David Reinhardt, Howard Rubin
and Elle Walker for reviewing and editing the report. A special note: Throughout many of our careers, we have
been fortunate to have the counsel and wisdom of Drs. Cummings and Wiggins. These committed
psychologists, both former presidents of the American Psychological Association, whose careers have spanned
many decades, have contributed so much to the practice and advocacy of behavioral health as they have shaped
the practice of professional psychology and psychologists. This report is as much a tribute to their thoughts and
concerns as it is for NAPPP.
Behavioral healthcare in America has largely been reassigned to primary care physicians as a result of the
overall penetration in healthcare of for-profit managed care companies and insurers, the long term campaign by
drug manufacturers to replace effective behavioral interventions with medications, and a two-decades long
shortage of psychiatrists. All of these factors have contributed to patients being denied effective treatments as
the profits of these companies continue to increase. The healthcare reform bill recently signed by President
Obama is unlikely to resolve any of the issues discussed in this report. In fact, the more likely outcome is that
patients seeking and needing effective behavioral healthcare will not get it because the new healthcare bill
further concentrates treatment and health decisions in primary care settings under the influence of insurance
corporations and other third party payers. Primary care physicians, as gatekeepers for physical ailments,
perform admirably under difficult circumstances. However, patients needing behavioral healthcare are not
receiving and cannot receive effective treatment from primary care physicians who generally are unskilled and
lack training evaluating, diagnosing and treating behavioral disorders. This report discusses the problems and
solutions associated with medications when used as a first-line treatment for behavioral disorders.
I. The Evidence Against Primary Care Physicians Providing Behavioral Healthcare
• The healthcare industry comprised of physician groups, insurers, large contract providers,
medical device companies, and the pharmaceutical industry has achieved total control of
the healthcare system that routinely misleads and colludes with government regulators.
• The healthcare industry has embraced the myth that a behavioral disorder is a medical
problem and implies that it is either genetically caused or neurohormonally caused, and
typically, lifelong requiring treatment with medications.
• Primary Care physicians providing behavioral healthcare overwhelmingly favor
medications as first-line treatments for behavioral disorders despite the evidence that
many of these drugs do not perform better than placebos.
• Renowned researchers have been writing voluminously for the need to require
protocols which include psychosocial and behavioral treatments with medications and
in some cases in place of medications.
• Primary care physicians routinely provide drugs without obtaining an evaluation or
appropriate diagnosis from a doctoral level psychologist or psychiatrist.
• Patients treated in primary care setting for behavioral disorders receive only 50% of the
standard of care that is required by medical guidelines.
• Behavioral healthcare Patients are exposed to undo risk and harm as primary care
physicians account for over 80% of the prescriptions written for psychotropic
medications. In effect, physicians have become virtual distributors for drug companies
despite the mounting evidence that many of these drugs are unwarranted and risky to
Visits to emergency rooms for the abuse of pain medications and sedatives are
now equal or exceed visits for heroin and other illegal drugs. This is a direct result
of physicians writing too many prescriptions for these drugs.
II. Reducing Adverse Drug Events From Physician Error
• Physician errors attributed to prescribing medications account for many deaths and
harm to patients. The Institute of Medicine continues to report the risk to patients
due to physician errors. While estimate may vary, the IOM believes that 100,000
deaths per year are caused by physician error. The IOM only counts deaths that occur
in hospitals. There is no comparable data for harm occurring in outpatient settings because
there is no formal reporting mechanism.
• Estimates of the annual cost due to increased harm from medication related injuries
ranges from a low of $72 billion to a high of $172 billion.
• Physician errors increase hospital costs on the average of $6000 per patient.
• Annual non-fatal injuries from Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) are estimated to be about
• Many of the errors attributed to medications can be reduced or eliminated by better
education and training. However, few medical schools have developed curriculum to
confront this problem. Physicians, at the best medical schools, receive only 90 hours
of training in pharmacology. Most provide far less. Even fewer, provide training to
reduce adverse drug events.
• Medical psychologists are in the unique position of being a positive factor in reducing
ADEs while at the same time providing behavioral health services effectively and
efficiently. Primary care physicians and other non-psychiatric physicians are neither
behavioral health specialists nor psychopharmacologists.
III. Psychiatry In Crisis: Impacts on Primary Care, Patient Safety and Public Healthcare Policy
• The number of medical students choosing psychiatry as a specialty has continued to
decline over the past two decades. The shortage of psychiatrists has been so steep that
no one believes that there is anything to impact the decline.
• As a result of this shortage, about 70% of primary care physicians have reported
difficulty in obtaining high quality outpatient behavioral health services.
• Psychiatrists, as a whole, have abandoned providing behavioral healthcare treatments
outside of medications. Few have sought or received behavioral training. As a result,
psychiatry no longer is a stakeholder for effective patient care. Their economic
survival is tied to drug companies and their allegiance to patients is highly
• Public safety has been compromised as psychiatry refuses to consider and implement
alternative strategies to deal with their shortage. Public policy and public safety have
been held hostage to economic factors as psychiatry continues to reject collaborative
practice with psychologists.
• Despite the overwhelming evidence showing that the most successful outcomes in
behavioral health treatment are a result of medications used concurrently with
psychotherapy or psychotherapy alone, psychiatry continues to subscribe to
medication, only strategies.
IV. Antidepressant Medications Are Ineffective And Claims Are Misleading
• Biologically based imbalance theories have long been posited as a basis for
antidepressant medications. These theories, although largely unfounded, untested, and
unproven, provide the foundation for medications sold by the millions of doses.
• There is no scientific substantiation or agreement that depression is caused by
biological, chemical imbalances, defective genes, or that it is remedied in any
significant way by available medications.
• Antidepressant medications actually build up less and less ability to function without
the drug and the condition becomes chronic. The data show that the longer one stays
on this type of drug the higher the likelihood of relapse of depression.
• The side effects of these drugs include cardiac complications, withdrawal, akathesia
and motor abnormalities, sexual side effects, drug-induced violence, neuropsychiatric
effects including insomnia, apathy, and mania. Physicians have responded to these side
effects by prescribing additional medications, most of which are "off-label" and not
authorized by the FDA.
• Psychotherapy approaches for depression are now well established as effective first
line treatments for depression and just as effective and, in many cases, more effective
than antidepressants without the risk of side effects.
• The results of many clinical trials, meta-analyses and reviews point to one inescapable
conclusion: Psychotherapy works for the treatment of depression, and the benefits are
• Antidepressants, only dampen or partially control some symptoms of the disorder and
in a minority of patients, and therefore do not qualify as a “stand alone” or a “first line
• The evidence is clear that antidepressant medications work no better than placebos in nearly
all patients with depression. The use of these chemicals on 32 million people, when they simply
do not work, presents a moral dilemma and should be a major public policy issue.
• Research shows that most people will respond positively to behavioral intervention.
Typically, 13 sessions of cognitive-behavioral intervention relieves symptoms and
allows patients to resume work, family responsibilities and function well.
• Only a smaller number of patients, a minority of about 12-15%, respond solely to
V. Physicians Often Do Not Provide Patients With Important Information
When Prescribing Medications
• Most physicians routinely do not provide important information to their patients when
they prescribe a medication. Research shows that only 62% of the necessary
information about a medication is communicated. to patients. Only, 35% of physicians
advised patients of the adverse effects associated with a medication. In attempt to address
this problem, it has become public policy to require dispensing pharmacists to provide
the missing information that the physician is either too under-informed or too rushed to provide.
• Among the most profitable and growing segment of pharmaceuticals are psychotropic
medications and their use by physicians for conditions for which they were not
developed or FDA approved. Physicians continue to prescribe these medications with
no research or data that can provide any clue of the side effects when prescribed for a
condition that has not been studied.
• The Nonpartisan Center for Public Integrity reports that pharmaceutical companies
spent more than $855 million for marketing, which is more than any other industry,
between the years of 1998 and 2006. Marketing comprises a significant portion of the
cost of medications. These are at the low end of the estimates for drug company advertising.
It is unnecessary and many times violates FDA rules for marketing a drug.
Even higher estimates for advertising Kaiser Foundation, both prescription use and shifts
to higher-priced drugs can be influenced by advertising, which is usually conducted for brand
name rather than generic drugs. Manufacturer spending on advertising was almost twice as
much in 2008 ($11.3 billion) as in 1998 ($5.9 billion). After increasing every year since 1996,
the total amount manufacturers spent on advertising declined from 2004 to 2005 (from $12.1
billion to $11.7 billion), rose to $12.0 billion in 2006, and fell to $11.8 billion in 2007 and
$11.3 billion in 2008. The share directed toward consumers in 2008, through advertising on
television, radio, magazines, newspapers, and outdoor advertising, was over 3 times the
spent in 1998, $4.4 billion compared to $1.3 billion, though spending decreased 10% from
2007 ($4.9) to 2008 ($4.4 billion).
• The marketing strategy used by drug companies is no different than that employed by
cereal manufacturers who line supermarket shelves with tens of boxes of the same
sugar laden cereals. Patients are being prescribed unnecessary medications and not
provided needed information and not getting the appropriate treatment because
psychologists are being kept out of the treatment mix and because drugs, in the short
term, are cheaper than more appropriate and proven care.
• The use of medical psychologists, those trained in applying behavioral interventions to
medical problems and clinical psychopharmacology, can be and are an effective
solution to control the unnecessary rise and subsequent costs for psychotropic
medications while providing patients with the necessary information to make
VI. Reducing Harm and Healthcare Costs: A Review Of A Physician's Unlimited License To Practice
• Generally, physicians are licensed under what is termed an "unlimited" license. What
this means is that a physician is free to practice and use whatever treatment they feel is
necessary without regard to training or education. Unlimited licensure is a public
safety issue that needs to be addressed and modified.
• Psychologists, nurses, nurse practitioners and other healthcare professionals practice
under what is termed a "limited" license. This means that these professionals can only
practice what is stated in their scope of practice law. They can legally provide services
that they have specific training, education, and experience and that fall only into the
categories of services that are specified in their practice law.
• State licensure boards establish procedures for granting initial licensure. However, in
virtually all states, it is possible for a physician to practice medicine for a lifetime
without having to demonstrate to the state medical board that he or she has maintained
an acceptable level of continuing qualifications or competence.
• The Federation of State Medical Boards, raising the concern about on-going physician
competency and the consequences that lack of training and competence can have on
patient care and outcomes believes that leniency provided to physicians is no longer
• The on-going expansion of advances in science and technology and the knowledge that
is required to digest and make use of this knowledge by physicians is at the core of
why unlimited licensure is bad for patients and is a direct cause of excessive
• The FSMB issues a report that raises concerns about the general poor quality of
medical school applicants; the small amount of time that physicians have to devote to
patients; and the shortage of American-trained physicians and the increased reliance
on foreign-trained physicians with limited language skills.
• There needs to be a balance between professional autonomy and patient care.
Unlimited licensure subverts treatment and ethical considerations because of economic
issues, or the interests of corporations such as drug manufacturers and insurers. It does
not promote a balance. It sabotages professional ethics and the foundation for an
effective and efficient healthcare system.
VII. Medicating America's Children
• Prescriptions for antipsychotic medications to children aged 2 to 5 years doubled
between the years 1999-2001 and 2007. The top-selling medicines in 2008 were anti-
psychotics for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with $14.6 billion in sales.
• The age of children being medicated with psychotropic drugs is getting younger and is
increasing every year. Yet, there is compelling research demonstrating the effective of
behavioral treatment to rapidly stabilize ADD/ADHD symptoms and without medication.
• There appears to be little evidence, if any, that these drugs are efficacious with this
population of patients yet physicians continue to prescribe drugs to children "off
label" and at doses developed for adults.
• Drug manufacturers have been charged with hiding, obscuring and falsifying the
results of clinical trials. The efficacy of Prozac, for example, could not be
distinguished from placebo in 6 out of 10 clinical trials. The FDA, nevertheless,
allowed Prozac to be prescribed to millions of patients including children.
It is clear that bipolar disorder is being over-diagnosed in children and adolescents.
Many of these patients are being treated in primary care settings . This is wrong, ill
advised, and potentially dangerous to the patient. Patients diagnosed with bipolar
disorder need to be evaluated and diagnosed by a doctoral psychologist or psychiatrist
and regularly followed by both during the course of treatment.
• Many children are prescribed psychostimulants for attention-deficit problems. To date,
not a solitary cause has yet been identified for ADHD. The National Institutes of
Health Consensus Development Conference and the American Academy of
Pediatrics agree that there is no known biological basis for ADHD. These drugs are
top sellers for drug manufacturers.
Large scale research shows that children who are prescribed psychostimulants and
are provided behavioral intervention have less need for these medications and experience
rapid stabilization of their symptoms.
• Children are at great risks when taking psychostimulant drugs. In 2007, the FDA
issued an administrative order that require that all makers of ADHD medications to
develop and provide patients with Medication Guides. The FDA took this action
because of complaints and the increasing data that concluded ADHD patients with
heart conditions had a higher risk of strokes, heart attacks, and sudden death when
using these medications.
• The psychological symptoms associated with these drugs include: hearing voices,
having hallucinations, becoming suspicious for no reason, or becoming manic.
• Strattera, a psychostimulant prescribed to children and teenagers, are more likely to
produce suicidal thoughts in children and teenagers than in those do not use this medication.
Children who use Strattera must be supervised and their behavior carefully monitored because
they may develop symptoms suddenly and they are a serious threat to the child.
• ADD/ADHD are not the only conditions that children are being prescribed potentially dangerous
medications. Increasingly, children as young as five years old are being diagnosed with bipolar disorder
by physicians without even an evaluation by a psychologist.
• The use of anti-depressant medication is commonly prescribed for pregnant women.
The use of these drugs during pregnancy is based upon the false assumption that they
are safe to the fetus and the mother. They are not and can produce serious medical
impairments for newborns.
VIII. Patients Deserve To Be Evaluated And Treated By Real Doctors
Since the penetration of managed care as the gatekeepers to healthcare, behavioral
health services have been the most negatively impacted.
As managed care became the gatekeeper for behavioral health services, costs dropped
40% as a result of delaying services , denying claims, arduous utilization review
procedures, phantom panels, and the use of non-doctoral level providers.
The U.S. Surgeon General in a report on mental health admitted that private health
insurance is generally more restrictive in coverage of mental illness than in coverage
for somatic illness.
Mental health parity legislation has not remedied the disparity in treatment for
behavioral health patients. Insurers and managed care companies employ sophisticated
utilization review procedures to delay and deny treatment.
Insurers state that they need these procedures to contain costs. Studies by health
economists have concluded that unlimited mental health benefits under managed
care cost virtually the same as capped benefits: The average increase was about $1
per employee compared with costs under a $25,000 cap, which is a typical limit
under cost containment plans.
IX. The Treatment Of The Aged In Long Term Care
The services that psychologists provide patients in long term care results in
benefits to patients and the healthcare system. However, the underutilization
of psychologists in these facilities remains a significant problem.
The shift from a custodial care model to a functional capacity model that utilizes
psychologists and other healthcare providers has increased the quality of care
provided to nursing home patients.
According to the American Geriatric Society there are 1.5 million older adults in
nursing homes, and anywhere from 65% to 91% have symptoms of a psychiatric
disorder. Beyond these primary psychiatric diagnoses, many of the medical conditions
presented on admission have underlying psychological factors that contribute to or
exacerbate the conditions.
The incidence of chronic disease, many research studies have repeatedly shown that
higher costs and reduced quality of life for medically ill individuals are associated
with depression, stress, and negative future outlook.
The Institute of Medicine in a recent report projects significant shortages of all health
professionals with specialized training in geriatrics and aging.
Despite this prevalence of psychological disorders in nursing homes, psychological
services, as elsewhere, have been impacted by the medicalization of behavioral
health. Elderly patients in nursing homes continue to be over-medicated and not
provided the level of behavioral interventions that are needed.
The Department of Health and Human Services published a report, saying that 7
out of the 10 leading health and illness indicators are psychological, such as inactivity,
obesity, smoking, substance abuse, behavioral illness, irresponsible sexual behavior,
and violence. Many elderly patients never receive the appropriate treatment for these
symptoms and are instead treated with ineffective drugs.
Numerous studies looking at the effect of psychological interventions on medical
utilization found that 90% of the studies showed reduced medical utilization
following some psychological intervention and a corresponding reduction in cost.
Studies show that there is an over-reliance of drugs in nursing home settings. These
studies show it is not uncommon for patients in nursing homes being prescribed
between 5 and 13 medications. The adverse drug events from this practice causes
deaths and other harms to elderly patients.
The increasing costs for medications that clearly can be reduced if physicians, more
often than not, would include behavioral interventions into the treatment plan.